From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [rfc, rfa/doc] Multi-threaded watchpoint improvements
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080416231831.GB6274@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jeabjtcsfb.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 01:04:56AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> infrun: infwait_nonstep_watch_state
> infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED
> infrun: stop_pc = 0x100004b0
> infrun: random signal 5
Thanks, I can see the problem. stepped_after_stopped_by_watchpoint is
set, but nothing is using that to indicate that we should report the
watchpoint.
We need to communicate this to bpstat_stop_status again after the
step. It's supposed to happen automatically, because only a call to
watchpoints_triggered ever clears the watchpoint_triggered flag.
How is it getting lost? I assume that it is getting lost; you
could set a breakpoint on bpstat_stop_status when it is called
just before the "random signal 5", after infwait_nonstep_watch_state,
and check.
I wonder if this could be related to Vladimir's changes to watchpoint
locations. No, the flag is on struct breakpoint, not struct
bp_location. I'm mystified.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-16 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-16 18:40 Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-22 9:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-22 14:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-22 14:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-22 15:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-22 15:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-22 18:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-01 0:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-24 14:59 ` Luis Machado
2007-10-24 16:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-24 16:42 ` Luis Machado
2007-10-24 16:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-24 18:08 ` Luis Machado
2007-10-24 18:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-16 22:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-16 23:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-16 23:18 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-17 0:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2008-04-17 9:52 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-17 9:59 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-17 10:17 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-17 14:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-20 2:35 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-23 11:55 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-23 19:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-05-01 19:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-01 19:50 ` Luis Machado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080416231831.GB6274@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox