From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Luis Machado <luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [rfc, rfa/doc] Multi-threaded watchpoint improvements
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071024181239.GA9590@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193252544.4316.19.camel@localhost>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:02:24PM -0300, Luis Machado wrote:
> Ok,
>
> This is the event log without the patch applied. I can see that it does
> have additional creation events occuring in the background, different
> than what occurs with the patch. Same source code, same compile flags.
This log isn't very useful, because it doesn't say _what_ is being
created. You might have better luck with the "set debug target 1"
logs, which will show watchpoints and breakpoints being inserted,
or "set debug frame 1" which will show you any failures to backtrace.
But after that you'll have to break out another copy of GDB.
Check when GDB is checking the watchpoint and what it finds out.
Might want to find a useful debug category to add some new messages
to :-)
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-24 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-16 18:40 Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-22 9:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-22 14:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-22 14:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-22 15:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-22 15:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-22 18:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-01 0:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-24 14:59 ` Luis Machado
2007-10-24 16:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-24 16:42 ` Luis Machado
2007-10-24 16:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-24 18:08 ` Luis Machado
2007-10-24 18:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2008-04-16 22:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-16 23:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-16 23:18 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-17 0:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-17 9:52 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-17 9:59 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-17 10:17 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-17 14:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-20 2:35 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-23 11:55 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-23 19:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-05-01 19:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-01 19:50 ` Luis Machado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071024181239.GA9590@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox