From: Luis Machado <luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [rfc, rfa/doc] Multi-threaded watchpoint improvements
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193252544.4316.19.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071024164712.GB4025@caradoc.them.org>
Ok,
This is the event log without the patch applied. I can see that it does
have additional creation events occuring in the background, different
than what occurs with the patch. Same source code, same compile flags.
== code ==
(gdb) set debug event 1
(gdb) start
breakpoint_create_event
Breakpoint 1 at 0x10000738: file testsuite/gdb.base/watch-thread_num.c,
line 39.
Starting program: /home/luis/src/gdb/gdb-head/git/gdb/test
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x400000257c0 (LWP 4236)]
[Switching to Thread 0x400000257c0 (LWP 4236)]
breakpoint_delete_event
main () at testsuite/gdb.base/watch-thread_num.c:39
39 for (i = 0; i < NUM; i++)
(gdb) watch i
During symbol reading, incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers (e.g.,
r0) at 0x10000738.
breakpoint_create_event
Hardware watchpoint 2: i
(gdb) n
41 res = pthread_create(&threads[i],
(gdb)
[New Thread 0x40000a26240 (LWP 4239)]
breakpoint_delete_event
39 for (i = 0; i < NUM; i++)
(gdb)
breakpoint_create_event
Hardware watchpoint 2: i
Old value = 0
New value = 1
0x0000000010000788 in main () at
testsuite/gdb.base/watch-thread_num.c:39
39 for (i = 0; i < NUM; i++)
(gdb)
41 res = pthread_create(&threads[i],
(gdb)
[New Thread 0x40001226240 (LWP 4240)]
breakpoint_delete_event
39 for (i = 0; i < NUM; i++)
(gdb)
breakpoint_create_event
Hardware watchpoint 2: i
Old value = 1
New value = 2
0x0000000010000788 in main () at
testsuite/gdb.base/watch-thread_num.c:39
39 for (i = 0; i < NUM; i++)
(gdb) n
41 res = pthread_create(&threads[i],
(gdb)
[New Thread 0x40001a26240 (LWP 4241)]
breakpoint_delete_event
39 for (i = 0; i < NUM; i++)
(gdb)
breakpoint_create_event
Hardware watchpoint 2: i
Old value = 2
New value = 3
0x0000000010000788 in main () at
testsuite/gdb.base/watch-thread_num.c:39
39 for (i = 0; i < NUM; i++)
(gdb)
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 12:47 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 02:22:00PM -0300, Luis Machado wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > This is what i get while trying to use a hardware watchpoint to monitor
> > an int variable "i" that changes during a for statement (attached). Upon
> > further investigation, it seems GDB is only calling
> > "breakpoint_delete_event". I don't see GDB calling
> > "breakpoint_create_event" anywhere except in the momment i created the
> > watchpoint up there, so i presume that's the reason it's not triggering.
>
> That's the only time it is supposed to be called; it's the event at
> the creation of a breakpoint. THe user creates it, it lives until it
> is deleted.
>
> > (gdb) watch i
> > During symbol reading, incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers (e.g.,
> > r0) at 0x10000738.
> > breakpoint_create_event (CREATED!)
> > Hardware watchpoint 2: i
> > (gdb) n
> > 41 res = pthread_create(&threads[i],
> > (gdb)
> > [New Thread 0x40000a26240 (LWP 3290)]
> > breakpoint_delete_event (DELETED! After this point, no more creations.)
>
> GDB has stopped for some reason and checked whether the watchpoint on
> i is still in scope. It thinks it isn't. This may be an unwinder
> problem. Since the scope is gone, the watchpoint is deleted.
>
> When you have a problem with watchpoints it's useful to remember that
> watchpoints on local variables are by far the most complicated kind.
> See if they still work on a global variable or a memory location.
>
--
Luis Machado
IBM Linux Technology Center
e-mail: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-24 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-16 18:40 Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-22 9:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-22 14:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-22 14:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-22 15:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-22 15:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-22 18:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-01 0:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-24 14:59 ` Luis Machado
2007-10-24 16:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-24 16:42 ` Luis Machado
2007-10-24 16:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-24 18:08 ` Luis Machado [this message]
2007-10-24 18:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-16 22:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-16 23:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-16 23:18 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-17 0:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-17 9:52 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-17 9:59 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-17 10:17 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-17 14:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-20 2:35 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-23 11:55 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-04-23 19:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-05-01 19:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-01 19:50 ` Luis Machado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1193252544.4316.19.camel@localhost \
--to=luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox