* [RFA/RFC] Fix broken user-thread debugging on x86-solaris
@ 2008-03-12 17:08 Joel Brobecker
2008-03-12 17:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2008-03-12 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2653 bytes --]
Hello,
While testing GDB on x86-solaris, I noticed that the debugger now prints
a warning during startup:
% ./gdb
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: ld.so.1: gdb.ref: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/lib/libthread_db.so.1: symbol ps_lgetLDT: referenced symbol not found]
GNU gdb 6.8.50.20080311-cvs
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
[...]
The problem was introduced when we killed the TM file, which was
defining the TM_I386SOL2_H macro that a couple of units were actually
using (ugh!).
Basically, the problem on x86-solaris is that, in order to load
libthread_db.so, we need to define ps_lgetLDT or the loading
will fail due to this symbol being undefined. This function is
defined inside sol-thread.c but is conditionalized on TM_I386SOL2_H
being defined:
#ifdef TM_I386SOL2_H
/* Reads the local descriptor table of a LWP. */
ps_err_e
ps_lgetLDT (gdb_ps_prochandle_t ph, lwpid_t lwpid,
struct ssd *pldt)
{
Similarly, a couple of other functions inside procfs.c that
this function uses are conditionalized on the same macro:
proc_get_LDT_entry and procfs_find_LDT_entry. This stuff is
entirely x86-solaris specific, so cannot be enabled on sparc-solaris.
I think the most classical way of fixing this would be to move these
to their own file, such as sol-x86-thread.c. But I'm not sure whether
this is going to be the prefered solution in this case, because
the procfs routines need access to certain fields of a structure
that is not public (struct procinfo).
In this version, I went to the simplest, which is to have configure
define a new macro (HAVE_X86_SOLARIS_USER_THREADS) when on x86-solaris
and the thread_db library is available. I then replaced TM_I386SOL2_H
by the new macro.
If I were to move the 3 functions to their own file, I would have
to create procfs.h to provide an opaque definition of struct procinfo.
I would also add a few accessor routines (to get the pid and the ctl_fd),
and make a few routines such as find_procinfo or proc_get_gregs non-static.
I don't mind doing this work, but I want to make sure others prefer it too.
2008-03-12 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
* configure.ac (HAVE_X86_SOLARIS_USER_THREADS): Define this macro
if we are building a native x86-solaris debugger that has access
to user-threads.
* configure, config.in: Regenerate.
* sol-thread.c, procfs.c : Use HAVE_X86_SOLARIS_USER_THREADS
in place of TM_I386SOL2_H.
Tested on x86-solaris. No regression.
Opinions?
BTW: We should fix this in the branch as well.
Thanks,
--
Joel
[-- Attachment #2: x86-user-threads.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3155 bytes --]
Index: configure.ac
===================================================================
--- configure.ac (revision 34930)
+++ configure.ac (working copy)
@@ -1221,6 +1221,11 @@ if test ${build} = ${host} -a ${host} =
[Define if <proc_service.h> on solaris uses int instead of
size_t, and assorted other type changes.])
fi
+ if test "${gdb_host_cpu}" = "i386" ; then
+ AC_DEFINE(HAVE_X86_SOLARIS_USER_THREADS, 1,
+ [Define if the thread layer uses the user-thread debug library
+ on an x86-solaris system])
+ fi
else
AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
fi
Index: configure
===================================================================
--- configure (revision 34930)
+++ configure (working copy)
@@ -22865,6 +22865,13 @@ cat >>confdefs.h <<\_ACEOF
_ACEOF
fi
+ if test "${gdb_host_cpu}" = "i386" ; then
+
+cat >>confdefs.h <<\_ACEOF
+#define HAVE_X86_SOLARIS_USER_THREADS 1
+_ACEOF
+
+ fi
else
echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5
echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6
Index: config.in
===================================================================
--- config.in (revision 34930)
+++ config.in (working copy)
@@ -482,6 +482,10 @@
/* Define to 1 if `vfork' works. */
#undef HAVE_WORKING_VFORK
+/* Define if the thread layer uses the user-thread debug library on an
+ x86-solaris system */
+#undef HAVE_X86_SOLARIS_USER_THREADS
+
/* Define to 1 if you have the `XML_StopParser' function. */
#undef HAVE_XML_STOPPARSER
Index: sol-thread.c
===================================================================
--- sol-thread.c (revision 34930)
+++ sol-thread.c (working copy)
@@ -1298,7 +1298,7 @@ ps_pdmodel (gdb_ps_prochandle_t ph, int
}
#endif /* PR_MODEL_LP64 */
-#ifdef TM_I386SOL2_H
+#ifdef HAVE_X86_SOLARIS_USER_THREADS
/* Reads the local descriptor table of a LWP. */
@@ -1326,7 +1326,7 @@ ps_lgetLDT (gdb_ps_prochandle_t ph, lwpi
/* LDT not found. */
return PS_ERR;
}
-#endif /* TM_I386SOL2_H */
+#endif /* HAVE_X86_SOLARIS_USER_THREADS */
\f
/* Convert PTID to printable form. */
Index: procfs.c
===================================================================
--- procfs.c (revision 34930)
+++ procfs.c (working copy)
@@ -3028,7 +3028,7 @@ proc_set_watchpoint (procinfo *pi, CORE_
#endif
}
-#ifdef TM_I386SOL2_H /* Is it hokey to use this? */
+#ifdef HAVE_X86_SOLARIS_USER_THREADS
#include <sys/sysi86.h>
@@ -3120,7 +3120,7 @@ proc_get_LDT_entry (procinfo *pi, int ke
#endif
}
-#endif /* TM_I386SOL2_H */
+#endif /* HAVE_X86_SOLARIS_USER_THREADS */
/* =============== END, non-thread part of /proc "MODULE" =============== */
@@ -5549,7 +5549,7 @@ procfs_stopped_by_watchpoint (ptid_t pti
return 0;
}
-#ifdef TM_I386SOL2_H
+#ifdef HAVE_X86_SOLARIS_USER_THREADS
/*
* Function: procfs_find_LDT_entry
*
@@ -5587,7 +5587,7 @@ procfs_find_LDT_entry (ptid_t ptid)
/* Find the matching entry and return it. */
return proc_get_LDT_entry (pi, key);
}
-#endif /* TM_I386SOL2_H */
+#endif /* HAVE_X86_SOLARIS_USER_THREADS */
/*
* Memory Mappings Functions:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/RFC] Fix broken user-thread debugging on x86-solaris
2008-03-12 17:08 [RFA/RFC] Fix broken user-thread debugging on x86-solaris Joel Brobecker
@ 2008-03-12 17:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-03-12 18:05 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2008-03-12 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:08:14AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> In this version, I went to the simplest, which is to have configure
> define a new macro (HAVE_X86_SOLARIS_USER_THREADS) when on x86-solaris
> and the thread_db library is available. I then replaced TM_I386SOL2_H
> by the new macro.
How about just #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__), if we're
going to use macros?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/RFC] Fix broken user-thread debugging on x86-solaris
2008-03-12 17:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2008-03-12 18:05 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-03-12 18:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2008-03-12 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
> > In this version, I went to the simplest, which is to have configure
> > define a new macro (HAVE_X86_SOLARIS_USER_THREADS) when on x86-solaris
> > and the thread_db library is available. I then replaced TM_I386SOL2_H
> > by the new macro.
>
> How about just #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__), if we're
> going to use macros?
I don't mind, but we also need to check for solaris too, since
procfs is used with other OSes as well. So something like this?
#if (defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)) && defined (sun)
It's funny you would prefer this approach over the more functional
macro - I thought that people would crucify me if I suggested something
like this :). Would you prefer to isolate the code in a separate file
like I also suggested?
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/RFC] Fix broken user-thread debugging on x86-solaris
2008-03-12 18:05 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2008-03-12 18:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-03-12 20:08 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2008-03-12 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:04:45AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I don't mind, but we also need to check for solaris too, since
> procfs is used with other OSes as well. So something like this?
>
> #if (defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)) && defined (sun)
>
> It's funny you would prefer this approach over the more functional
> macro - I thought that people would crucify me if I suggested something
> like this :). Would you prefer to isolate the code in a separate file
> like I also suggested?
I have no preference whatsoever; just whatever is easier in practice.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/RFC] Fix broken user-thread debugging on x86-solaris
2008-03-12 18:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2008-03-12 20:08 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2008-03-12 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 718 bytes --]
> I have no preference whatsoever; just whatever is easier in practice.
That works for me :) - we can always adjust later if I hear some more
comments. Here is what I ended up checking-in (I used the opportunity
to add a little comment explaining why the function is needed, as well as
grouping the two LDT-related functions in procfs.c together).
2008-02-12 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
* sol-thread.c: Replace use of TM_I386SOL2_H by an expression
that is true only on x86-solaris and x86_64-solaris.
* procfs.c: Likewise. Move procfs_find_LDT_entry up together
with proc_get_LDT_entry.
Tested on x86-solaris, no regression. Applied to head and branch.
Thanks!
--
Joel
[-- Attachment #2: x86-solaris-thread.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3769 bytes --]
Index: sol-thread.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/sol-thread.c,v
retrieving revision 1.63
diff -u -p -r1.63 sol-thread.c
--- sol-thread.c 23 Jan 2008 11:26:28 -0000 1.63
+++ sol-thread.c 12 Mar 2008 18:39:54 -0000
@@ -1283,9 +1283,12 @@ ps_pdmodel (gdb_ps_prochandle_t ph, int
}
#endif /* PR_MODEL_LP64 */
-#ifdef TM_I386SOL2_H
+#if (defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)) && defined (sun)
-/* Reads the local descriptor table of a LWP. */
+/* Reads the local descriptor table of a LWP.
+
+ This function is necessary on x86-solaris only. Without it, the loading
+ of libthread_db would fail because of ps_lgetLDT being undefined. */
ps_err_e
ps_lgetLDT (gdb_ps_prochandle_t ph, lwpid_t lwpid,
@@ -1311,7 +1314,7 @@ ps_lgetLDT (gdb_ps_prochandle_t ph, lwpi
/* LDT not found. */
return PS_ERR;
}
-#endif /* TM_I386SOL2_H */
+#endif
\f
/* Convert PTID to printable form. */
Index: procfs.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/procfs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.85
diff -u -p -r1.85 procfs.c
--- procfs.c 25 Jan 2008 00:09:49 -0000 1.85
+++ procfs.c 12 Mar 2008 18:39:55 -0000
@@ -2919,7 +2919,7 @@ proc_set_watchpoint (procinfo *pi, CORE_
#endif
}
-#ifdef TM_I386SOL2_H /* Is it hokey to use this? */
+#if (defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)) && defined (sun)
#include <sys/sysi86.h>
@@ -3011,7 +3011,45 @@ proc_get_LDT_entry (procinfo *pi, int ke
#endif
}
-#endif /* TM_I386SOL2_H */
+/*
+ * Function: procfs_find_LDT_entry
+ *
+ * Input:
+ * ptid_t ptid; // The GDB-style pid-plus-LWP.
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * pointer to the corresponding LDT entry.
+ */
+
+struct ssd *
+procfs_find_LDT_entry (ptid_t ptid)
+{
+ gdb_gregset_t *gregs;
+ int key;
+ procinfo *pi;
+
+ /* Find procinfo for the lwp. */
+ if ((pi = find_procinfo (PIDGET (ptid), TIDGET (ptid))) == NULL)
+ {
+ warning (_("procfs_find_LDT_entry: could not find procinfo for %d:%d."),
+ PIDGET (ptid), TIDGET (ptid));
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ /* get its general registers. */
+ if ((gregs = proc_get_gregs (pi)) == NULL)
+ {
+ warning (_("procfs_find_LDT_entry: could not read gregs for %d:%d."),
+ PIDGET (ptid), TIDGET (ptid));
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ /* Now extract the GS register's lower 16 bits. */
+ key = (*gregs)[GS] & 0xffff;
+
+ /* Find the matching entry and return it. */
+ return proc_get_LDT_entry (pi, key);
+}
+
+#endif
/* =============== END, non-thread part of /proc "MODULE" =============== */
@@ -5331,46 +5369,6 @@ procfs_stopped_by_watchpoint (ptid_t pti
return 0;
}
-#ifdef TM_I386SOL2_H
-/*
- * Function: procfs_find_LDT_entry
- *
- * Input:
- * ptid_t ptid; // The GDB-style pid-plus-LWP.
- *
- * Return:
- * pointer to the corresponding LDT entry.
- */
-
-struct ssd *
-procfs_find_LDT_entry (ptid_t ptid)
-{
- gdb_gregset_t *gregs;
- int key;
- procinfo *pi;
-
- /* Find procinfo for the lwp. */
- if ((pi = find_procinfo (PIDGET (ptid), TIDGET (ptid))) == NULL)
- {
- warning (_("procfs_find_LDT_entry: could not find procinfo for %d:%d."),
- PIDGET (ptid), TIDGET (ptid));
- return NULL;
- }
- /* get its general registers. */
- if ((gregs = proc_get_gregs (pi)) == NULL)
- {
- warning (_("procfs_find_LDT_entry: could not read gregs for %d:%d."),
- PIDGET (ptid), TIDGET (ptid));
- return NULL;
- }
- /* Now extract the GS register's lower 16 bits. */
- key = (*gregs)[GS] & 0xffff;
-
- /* Find the matching entry and return it. */
- return proc_get_LDT_entry (pi, key);
-}
-#endif /* TM_I386SOL2_H */
-
/*
* Memory Mappings Functions:
*/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-12 20:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-12 17:08 [RFA/RFC] Fix broken user-thread debugging on x86-solaris Joel Brobecker
2008-03-12 17:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-03-12 18:05 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-03-12 18:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-03-12 20:08 ` Joel Brobecker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox