Re: [RFA] Make symbol completion language-specific

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>]

> >   1. How does someone verify that a GDB command does not return
> >      any output. Do we really have to do it "manually" (using
> >      gdb_send et al)?  Right now, there is a hole in my testcase
> >      regarding this, and I need to fix it before I commit it.
> 
> Pretty much, though I think you could do it with gdb_test_multiple;
> see how lib/mi-support.exp does it.  MI tests are anchored by default.
> There may be more trouble doing it for the CLI, though, because
> readline puts extra stuff in the output sometimes.

Will take a look, thanks. I suggest we add a new routine inside gdb.exp
that does check that a given command doesn't return any output. Would
that be ok?

> Also see gdb_expect_list, which is similar.  I think that the way
> you've written it lends to things being too far indented, which will
> be hard to read...

Thanks for the tip! I'll have a look as well.

> > +struct string_vector
> > +{
> > +  char **array; /* The vector itself.  */
> > +  int index;    /* Index of the next available element in the array.  */
> > +  size_t size;  /* The number of entries allocated in the array.  */
> > +};
> 
> We have a generic VEC nowadays.

Argh, right. I will rewrite the patch to use a VEC, remove the FIXME,
and resubmit.

Thanks,
-- 
Joel