* [rfc] Remove dead code in breakpoint.c
@ 2007-06-22 9:30 Markus Deuling
2007-07-01 22:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Markus Deuling @ 2007-06-22 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GDB Patches; +Cc: Ulrich Weigand, Mark Kettenis
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 521 bytes --]
Hello,
there is no place where DISABLE_UNSETTABLE_BREAK macro is defined. So I guess the code in
breakpoint.c is dead code. But I'm not sure about this- Is there a situation where the removed
code is used? If so please ignore that patch.
ChangeLog:
* breakpoint.c (insert_bp_location): Remove dead code
(DISABLE_UNSETTABLE_BREAK).
(disable_breakpoints_in_shlibs)
(disable_breakpoints_in_unloaded_shlib): Likewise (comment).
Is this ok ?
--
Markus Deuling
GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE
deuling@de.ibm.com
[-- Attachment #2: diff-DISABLE_UNSETTABLE_BREAK --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1028 bytes --]
diff -urN src/gdb/breakpoint.c dev/gdb/breakpoint.c
--- src/gdb/breakpoint.c 2007-06-13 20:02:38.000000000 +0200
+++ dev/gdb/breakpoint.c 2007-06-22 10:04:16.000000000 +0200
@@ -963,13 +963,7 @@
if (val)
{
/* Can't set the breakpoint. */
- if (
-#if defined (DISABLE_UNSETTABLE_BREAK)
- DISABLE_UNSETTABLE_BREAK (bpt->address)
-#else
- solib_address (bpt->address)
-#endif
- )
+ if (solib_address (bpt->address))
{
/* See also: disable_breakpoints_in_shlibs. */
val = 0;
@@ -4488,7 +4482,6 @@
struct breakpoint *b;
int disabled_shlib_breaks = 0;
- /* See also: insert_breakpoints, under DISABLE_UNSETTABLE_BREAK. */
ALL_BREAKPOINTS (b)
{
if (((b->type == bp_breakpoint) || (b->type == bp_hardware_breakpoint))
@@ -4524,7 +4517,6 @@
struct breakpoint *b;
int disabled_shlib_breaks = 0;
- /* See also: insert_breakpoints, under DISABLE_UNSETTABLE_BREAK. */
ALL_BREAKPOINTS (b)
{
if ((b->loc->loc_type == bp_loc_hardware_breakpoint
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfc] Remove dead code in breakpoint.c
2007-06-22 9:30 [rfc] Remove dead code in breakpoint.c Markus Deuling
@ 2007-07-01 22:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-07-02 18:34 ` Ulrich Weigand
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2007-07-01 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Deuling; +Cc: GDB Patches, Ulrich Weigand, Mark Kettenis
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:28:23AM +0200, Markus Deuling wrote:
> Hello,
>
> there is no place where DISABLE_UNSETTABLE_BREAK macro is defined. So I guess
> the code in
> breakpoint.c is dead code. But I'm not sure about this- Is there a situation
> where the removed
> code is used? If so please ignore that patch.
>
> ChangeLog:
>
> * breakpoint.c (insert_bp_location): Remove dead code
> (DISABLE_UNSETTABLE_BREAK).
> (disable_breakpoints_in_shlibs)
> (disable_breakpoints_in_unloaded_shlib): Likewise (comment).
>
> Is this ok ?
Yes, this is OK. Thanks.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfc] Remove dead code in breakpoint.c
2007-07-01 22:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2007-07-02 18:34 ` Ulrich Weigand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Weigand @ 2007-07-02 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: Markus Deuling, GDB Patches, Mark Kettenis
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:28:23AM +0200, Markus Deuling wrote:
> > * breakpoint.c (insert_bp_location): Remove dead code
> > (DISABLE_UNSETTABLE_BREAK).
> > (disable_breakpoints_in_shlibs)
> > (disable_breakpoints_in_unloaded_shlib): Likewise (comment).
> >
> > Is this ok ?
>
> Yes, this is OK. Thanks.
I've checked this in now, thanks.
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-02 18:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-22 9:30 [rfc] Remove dead code in breakpoint.c Markus Deuling
2007-07-01 22:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-07-02 18:34 ` Ulrich Weigand
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox