Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: TUI + gdbserver broken?
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070319221430.GA24326@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45FEF7B0.9070209@portugalmail.pt>

On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 08:50:56PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Is TUI testable?

Probably, but it would require someone comfortable with expect to set
it up, I suspect.

> Since TUI is sitting on top of deprecated hooks, it TUI itself deprecated?

No.

> static void
> tui_selected_frame_level_changed_hook (int level)
> {
>     struct frame_info *fi;

>     fi = deprecated_safe_get_selected_frame ();
>     /* Ensure that symbols for this frame are read in.  Also, determine the
>        source language of this frame, and switch to it if desired.  */
>     if (fi)
>       {
>         struct symtab *s;

How about this:

  if (level >= 0)
    {
      struct frame_info *fi = get_selected_frame (NULL);

Insight wants to be notified even if there's no frame, apparently
(gross, I hate the way Insight is still attached at the hip to GDB -
I honestly believe that in a few years we'll have no choice but to
break Insight).  But TUI doesn't.

> Here is an updated patch that also fixes the problem.
> The comments in the patch should make it obvious, and I think it does
> what you hinted at.

No, I meant at a higher level (i.e. why we were calling the hook).
The frame cache is supposed to be a cache - we should be able to
discard it at any and every time.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-19 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-19  1:53 Pedro Alves
2007-03-19  2:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-19 15:58   ` Denis PILAT
2007-03-27 20:09     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-04-17 15:48       ` [RFA] TUI is broken under Solaris Denis PILAT
2007-04-17 15:51         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-04-18  8:24           ` Denis PILAT
2007-03-19 21:43   ` TUI + gdbserver broken? Pedro Alves
2007-03-19 22:14     ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2007-03-19 23:31       ` Pedro Alves
2007-03-19 23:41         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-20  0:39           ` Pedro Alves
2007-03-20  2:56             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-20  9:05               ` Pedro Alves
2007-03-20 23:21                 ` Pedro Alves
2007-03-22  2:51                   ` Pedro Alves
2007-03-27 20:15                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-29  2:26                       ` Pedro Alves
2007-03-29 18:55                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
     [not found] <45F7480C.5010207@portugalmail.pt>
2007-03-14  8:29 ` Denis PILAT

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070319221430.GA24326@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox