From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: Disable ARM RDP
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060411200009.GA3235@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060324203053.GC26748@nevyn.them.org>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 03:30:53PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:25:42PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >
> > This patch removes remote-rdp.o from ARM's TDEPFILES since Daniel and
> > Paul say that it's useless to most people. I also found that with
> > --disable-sim GDB fails to link because remote-rdp.c references a
> > function defined in the simulator.
> >
> > I'm not sure if this is the right patch for mainline, or whether
> > people would rather I remove remote-rdp.c entirely, or do nothing, or
> > ... So, I guess this is a request for approval, but a pretty
> > tentative one.
>
> > * gdb/config/arm/embed.mt (TDEPFILES): Remove remote-rdp.o.
>
> Well, this patch isn't OK. Afterwards remote-rdp is orphaned - no
> other configuration uses it. So, either we are removing it, or we
> aren't.
>
> I'm in favor of removing it. Strikes against it:
>
> - It doesn't build with --disable-sim.
> - It doesn't build on some versions of MinGW32, because it
> references sleep().
> - It's an old remote protocol and I haven't seen any reports of
> it being used.
> - Using RDP directly is even older than using RDI to talk to
> the same devices, which we've already removed.
>
> I have no real preference on removing it immediately versus marking it
> obsolete in the next release; the first two bullets are problems for
> CodeSourcery, but we can always turn it off in our release branch.
> But I'd like to do one or the other. Anyone have a preference?
I didn't see any comments on this. I'm pretty confident that no one
uses this protocol any more, so I would like to remove it, unless
anyone objects.
So, please speak up, if you object to "target rdp" being removed from
the arm-elf target. No other triplet enables it.
(I had to apply a global interface change to remote-rdp.c today,
which reminded me. Many of these remote targets I'm patching
deserve to be removed. Let's make sure to get a complete list
before the next release...)
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-11 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-18 2:40 Mark Mitchell
2006-03-24 21:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-11 20:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-05-05 19:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-17 14:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-17 18:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060411200009.GA3235@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox