From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PR threads/2015: Fix adjust_pc_after_break for thread debugging
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050927222351.GB22753@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050927221952.GA22753@nevyn.them.org>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:19:52PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:10:18AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > adjust_pc_after_break is doing the wrong thing during thread debugging
> > when the current thread is different from the thread when the debuggee was
> > stopped last. The problem is that it calls currently_stepping, which
> > accesses global variables that are part of the thread context. But the
> > context switch will only happen much later on. The proposed fix will skip
> > the call when the current infrun context does not match the thread to be
> > examined. This has been tested on x86_64-suse-linux and fixes 32
> > testcases without any regressions.
>
> Which test failures are these? i.e. why doesn't anyone else see this
> when they run the testsuite?
>
> Offhand I'd be suspicious that this helped - some other thread probably
> needs its PC adjusted and now may not be.
As a followup to my questions: it looks like the only globals which are
used are also in ecs, so currently_stepping could easily be fixed to
read only from ecs. But it's not clear whether we'd want to do this
test on ecs, inferior_ptid, or both.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-27 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-27 22:10 Andreas Schwab
2005-09-27 22:18 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-09-27 22:36 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-09-27 22:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-27 22:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-09-27 22:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-09-28 14:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-28 15:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-09-28 15:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-28 18:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050927222351.GB22753@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox