From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Removal of markup annotations
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 19:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050703190449.GJ13811@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17071.40307.949193.158796@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 03:16:03PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
>
> Here's the patch for the removal of some of the level 2 annotations that I
> referred to yesterday. It primarily removes the markup annotations that
> worked just with level (annotation_level == 2) and leaves those which also
> worked with level 3 (annotation_level > 2). But it also restricts
> breakpoints_changed and annotate_frames_invalid to level 2.
> breakpoints_changed doesn't get called at the moment because currently
> deprecated_delete_breakpoint_hook and deprecated_modify_breakpoint_hook have
> been set to zero in clear_interpreter_hooks. I have already submitted a
> patch for this (2005-06-04).
>
> This patch cleans up the code quite considerably and hopefully will relieve
> some of the pressure to remove the remaining annotations.
Is there "pressure"? I don't see the point in snipping out bits of
-annotate=2 until we're ready to remove it entirely, which I would like
to do but I accept that we are not yet ready for.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-03 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-15 3:19 Nick Roberts
2005-06-15 15:41 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-15 23:07 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-15 23:35 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-15 23:58 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-21 1:41 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-21 6:00 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-21 10:22 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-16 3:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-15 17:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-15 21:41 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-20 11:54 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-20 19:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-20 21:48 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-21 3:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-21 7:32 ` Nick Roberts
[not found] ` <uacljzbgq.fsf@gnu.org>
2005-06-21 23:47 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-22 3:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-22 6:22 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-03 19:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-07-03 22:13 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-03 22:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-28 0:17 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-28 2:39 ` Bob Rossi
2005-09-28 3:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-28 6:40 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-28 13:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-28 22:52 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-28 22:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050703190449.GJ13811@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox