From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Removal of markup annotations
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 22:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17096.24639.940089.355645@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050703190449.GJ13811@nevyn.them.org>
> > This patch cleans up the code quite considerably and hopefully will relieve
> > some of the pressure to remove the remaining annotations.
>
> Is there "pressure"? I don't see the point in snipping out bits of
> -annotate=2 until we're ready to remove it entirely, which I would like
> to do but I accept that we are not yet ready for.
Its hard for me to tell if the pressure is real or imagined. There _was_
pressure two years ago (around Jan 2002) but the people involved aren't
currently active on the mailing list. The idea behind level 3 annotations
_was_ to allow snipping out a (large) bit of the sprinkled code for
annotations. Its not a problem for me. If its not a problem for anyone else,
then it might as well stay (although that does beg the question as to why
it needs to be removed at all).
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-03 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-15 3:19 Nick Roberts
2005-06-15 15:41 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-15 23:07 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-15 23:35 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-15 23:58 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-21 1:41 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-21 6:00 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-21 10:22 ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-16 3:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-15 17:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-15 21:41 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-20 11:54 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-20 19:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-20 21:48 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-21 3:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-21 7:32 ` Nick Roberts
[not found] ` <uacljzbgq.fsf@gnu.org>
2005-06-21 23:47 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-22 3:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-22 6:22 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-03 19:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-03 22:13 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2005-07-03 22:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-28 0:17 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-28 2:39 ` Bob Rossi
2005-09-28 3:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-28 6:40 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-28 13:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-28 22:52 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-28 22:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17096.24639.940089.355645@farnswood.snap.net.nz \
--to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox