Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Removal of markup annotations
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050615154057.GB20778@white> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17071.40307.949193.158796@farnswood.snap.net.nz>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 03:16:03PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
> 
> Here's the patch for the removal of some of the level 2 annotations that I
> referred to yesterday.  It primarily removes the markup annotations that
> worked just with level (annotation_level == 2) and leaves those which also
> worked with level 3 (annotation_level > 2).  But it also restricts
> breakpoints_changed and annotate_frames_invalid to level 2.
> breakpoints_changed doesn't get called at the moment because currently
> deprecated_delete_breakpoint_hook and deprecated_modify_breakpoint_hook have
> been set to zero in clear_interpreter_hooks.  I have already submitted a
> patch for this (2005-06-04).
> 
> This patch cleans up the code quite considerably and hopefully will relieve
> some of the pressure to remove the remaining annotations.
> 
> Nick
> 
> 
> 2005-06-15  Nick Roberts  <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
> 
> 	* annotate.c (print_value_flags, annotate_signal_name)
> 	(annotate_signal_name_end, annotate_signal_string)
> 	(annotate_signal_string_end, annotate_breakpoints_headers)
> 	(annotate_field, annotate_breakpoints_table, annotate_record)
> 	(annotate_breakpoints_table_end, annotate_field_begin)
> 	(annotate_field_name_end, annotate_field_value)
> 	(annotate_field_end, annotate_value_history_begin)
> 	(annotate_value_begin, annotate_value_history_value)
> 	(annotate_value_history_end, annotate_value_end)
> 	(annotate_display_begin, annotate_display_number_end)
> 	(annotate_display_format, annotate_display_expression)
> 	(annotate_display_expression_end, annotate_display_value)
> 	(annotate_display_end, annotate_arg_begin, annotate_arg_name_end)
> 	(annotate_arg_value, annotate_arg_end, annotate_frame_begin)
> 	(annotate_function_call, annotate_signal_handler_caller)
> 	(annotate_frame_address, annotate_frame_address_end)
> 	(annotate_frame_function_name, annotate_frame_args)
> 	(annotate_frame_source_begin, annotate_frame_source_file)
> 	(annotate_frame_source_file_end, annotate_frame_source_line)
> 	(annotate_frame_source_end, annotate_frame_where)
> 	(annotate_frame_end, annotate_array_section_begin)
> 	(annotate_elt_rep, annotate_elt_rep_end, annotate_elt)
> 	(annotate_array_section_end): Remove.
> 	(annotate_stopped): Call breakpoints_changed for level
> 	2 annotations only.
> 	(annotate_frames_invalid, _initialize_annotate): 
> 	Act only with level 2 annotations.
> 

Hi Nick,

Out of all of the annotations that you are removing here, CGDB only
depends on annotate_breakpoints_headers, annotate_field,
annotate_breakpoints_table, annotate_record and
annotate_breakpoints_table_end.

I'll have to look deeper to verify this, but if this is true, it would
really simplify my life if we could leave those in. That at least would
allow CGDB to work with the next release of GDB while I work on
GDB/MI and getting CGDB to integrate with it.

Thanks,
Bob Rossi


  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-15 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-15  3:19 Nick Roberts
2005-06-15 15:41 ` Bob Rossi [this message]
2005-06-15 23:07   ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-15 23:35     ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-15 23:58       ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-21  1:41         ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-21  6:00           ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-21 10:22             ` Bob Rossi
2005-06-16  3:28       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-15 17:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-15 21:41   ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-20 11:54   ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-20 19:29     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-20 21:48       ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-21  3:41         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-21  7:32           ` Nick Roberts
     [not found]             ` <uacljzbgq.fsf@gnu.org>
2005-06-21 23:47               ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-22  3:25                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-22  6:22                   ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-03 19:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-03 22:13   ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-03 22:45     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-28  0:17 ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-28  2:39   ` Bob Rossi
2005-09-28  3:45   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-28  6:40     ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-28 13:11       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-28 22:52         ` Nick Roberts
2005-09-28 22:56           ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050615154057.GB20778@white \
    --to=bob@brasko.net \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox