From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
To: jjohnstn@redhat.com
Cc: jjohnstn@redhat.com, drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Modified Watchthreads Patch
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 14:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200412111449.iBBEn9ao007261@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41BA36C5.2030304@redhat.com> (message from Jeff Johnston on Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:52:37 -0500)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:52:37 -0500
From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
As I observed before, the actual watchpoint only needs to be set on
one thread and it will trigger in other threads. I can send you
the additional patch if you want to experiment with it.
This is highly suspicious. I think it means that there is a bug in
the kernel. Of course that's in the eye of the beholder since the
there is no documentation whatsoever how watchpoints should work in
the Linux kernel. I think that, before we change GDB, we should
insists that this gets properly documented, and agreed on by the
kernel people.
I am still waiting for a machine with the latest RH kernel on it.
I'll let you know if that works the same.
What the latest RH kernel does should be mostly irrelevant to the GDB
project. What matters is what the official Linux kernel does. We
should realize that not everybody is using a kernel that was released
just a week ago. GDB should also work on older kernels (we've
previously stated that it will work on version 2.0 and later). Of
course we don't support all features on those kernels, but we
shouldn't break features that worked on those kernels before. It
seems to me the i386 watchpoint issue has a high-risk to break older
kernels.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-11 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-10 4:24 Jeff Johnston
2004-12-10 13:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 14:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-10 18:01 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-24 11:05 ` Michael Snyder
2005-01-07 0:23 ` jjohnstn
2004-12-10 23:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 23:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-10 19:10 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-10 22:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-23 22:32 ` Michael Snyder
2004-12-24 14:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 20:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-10 20:30 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-10 20:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-10 22:18 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-10 23:57 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-11 0:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 1:28 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-11 14:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 16:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 18:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 18:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 19:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 19:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-12 5:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 21:54 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-11 14:53 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2004-12-11 16:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 2:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 16:11 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-10 23:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 23:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-10 23:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 23:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 11:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 14:49 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-11 16:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 17:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 17:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 18:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 18:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 19:06 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-11 19:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 16:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 16:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 17:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 17:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 18:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 18:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-01-13 19:22 ` Jeff Johnston
2005-02-11 1:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-02-11 18:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-02-11 18:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-02-12 21:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 19:35 Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200412111449.iBBEn9ao007261@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=kettenis@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jjohnstn@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox