From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Modified Watchthreads Patch
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 20:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041210191015.GA18430@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41B8E16D.6070505@redhat.com>
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 06:36:13PM -0500, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> The following is a modified version of my thread watchpoint patch from
> October/November. It removes the code I had used to switch between lwp
> ptids and thread ptids now that Daniel's lwp patch is in place. It uses
> the former version of my observer that is linux-specific and is activated
> in attach_thread in linux-thread-db.c. Eli, I renamed the observer as
> asked to indicate this.
>
> I also addressed Ulrich's comments regarding simplifying the S390 code and
> using the s390_fix_watch_points call to actually put the watchpoints on the
> new thread.
>
> Ulrich/Daniel can you take a look to verify everything is in place.
> Daniel, I realize that this touches files that are currently in patch state
> for you. I have no problem waiting for your latest patch to apply and
> retrofitting my changes at check-in if necessary.
>
> As I mentioned before, more is required to get ia64 threaded watchpoints to
> work. For S390, this change allows it to set and recognize threaded
> watchpoints.
Two formatting comments: please replace "linux" in comments with
"GNU/Linux", and please check copyright years on the modified files.
On the technical side, two questions:
1) I can see that it will be a bit of work to rearrange i386-linux to
use this, but it should be doable. Do you know offhand of any
i386-specific problems other than inserting watchpoints for all
threads?
2) What should to_stopped_by_watchpoint do in the presence of multiple
threads? It looks like it relies on inferior_ptid being the thread
which stopped at a watchpoint; I'm worried that that may not be
consistently true in a heavily threaded application. Maybe it should
iterate over all threads.
The to_stopped_data_address has its own problems with threads; but the
case of handling hitting two watchpoints at once, I think, we can leave
for another day.
This is looking very good so far!
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-10 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-10 4:24 Jeff Johnston
2004-12-10 13:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 14:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-10 18:01 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-24 11:05 ` Michael Snyder
2005-01-07 0:23 ` jjohnstn
2004-12-10 23:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 23:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-10 19:10 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-10 22:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-23 22:32 ` Michael Snyder
2004-12-24 14:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 20:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-12-10 20:30 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-10 20:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-10 22:18 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-10 23:57 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-11 0:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 1:28 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-11 14:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 16:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 18:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 18:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 19:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 19:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-12 5:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 21:54 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-11 14:53 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-11 16:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 2:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 16:11 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-10 23:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 23:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-10 23:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 23:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 11:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 14:49 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-11 16:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 17:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 17:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 18:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 18:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 19:06 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-11 19:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 16:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 16:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 17:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 17:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 18:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 18:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-01-13 19:22 ` Jeff Johnston
2005-02-11 1:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-02-11 18:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-02-11 18:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-02-12 21:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 19:35 Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041210191015.GA18430@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jjohnstn@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox