Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Modified Watchthreads Patch
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041210133116.GA11060@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01c4deb2$Blat.v2.2.2$ce83b6e0@zahav.net.il>

On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 02:20:39PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Hmm... the new function insert_watchpoints_for_new_thread is called
> only by ia64_linux_new_thread.  Is there any policy for functions that
> are only used by a single port?  Do we care that all the other GDB
> builds will get a useless function compiled into them?  Should we
> perhaps #ifdef it away conditioned on some symbol?

Let's not.  Conditional compilation is bad... if it were more than a
single function, we could move it into its own file.

However, I think ia64_linux_new_thread's use should be taken as an
example.  If I understand Jeff's patch correctly, a number of other
targets with hardware watchpoints will need it also.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz


  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-10 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-10  4:24 Jeff Johnston
2004-12-10 13:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 14:21   ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-12-10 18:01     ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-24 11:05       ` Michael Snyder
2005-01-07  0:23         ` jjohnstn
2004-12-10 23:01     ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 23:31       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-10 19:10   ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-10 22:51     ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-23 22:32   ` Michael Snyder
2004-12-24 14:46     ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 20:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-10 20:30   ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-10 20:47     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-10 22:18       ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-10 23:57         ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-11  0:31           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11  1:28             ` Jeff Johnston
2004-12-11 14:34           ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 16:56             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 18:01               ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 18:06                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 19:08                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 19:30                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-12  5:22                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 21:54                   ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-11 14:53           ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-11 16:52             ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11  2:04       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 16:11         ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-10 23:06   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 23:10     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-10 23:37       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-10 23:52         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 11:32           ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 14:49             ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-11 16:48               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 17:33                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 17:53                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 18:07                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 18:50                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 19:06                 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-11 19:07                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 16:49               ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 16:37             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 17:30               ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 17:38                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-11 18:02                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 18:10                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-01-13 19:22                   ` Jeff Johnston
2005-02-11  1:57                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-02-11 18:18                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-02-11 18:31                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-02-12 21:50                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-12-11 19:35 Ulrich Weigand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041210133116.GA11060@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jjohnstn@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox