Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa:symtab] deprecate inside_entry_func
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:59:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031121195949.GA794@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FBE6D46.4070201@redhat.com>

On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:53:42PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >This patch deprecates the function inside_entry_func.
> >
> >PS: Ref: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-10/msg00533.html
> 
> Here's a revised patch.  It now eliminates the [disabled] 
> inside_entry_func call from "get_prev_frame", replacing it with the more 
> direct [but equally disabled] get_frame_func() == entry_point_address() 
> test.  This way all calls to inside_entry_func have been eliminated from 
> up-to-date code.
> 
> Thoughts? Symtab ok?
> 
> Andrew
> 

What Kevin and I have both repeatedly suggested, I think, is:
  - Do not deprecate inside_entry_func; fix it if you don't like the
    way it is implemented.  Change the implementation.
  - Deprecate entry_func_lowpc and entry_func_highpc (there's a typo in
    your changelog, two lowpc's) if you really want to deprecate
    something.

The concept of inside_entry_func does not seem to be deprecated, so why
rename it?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-21 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-01  0:07 Andrew Cagney
2003-11-01  0:37 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-11-01  0:46   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-01  0:55     ` Kevin Buettner
2003-11-01  2:27       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-07 17:31         ` Kevin Buettner
2003-11-07 21:25           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-01  0:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-01  2:37   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-09  0:13     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-09  2:40       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-09  3:50         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-21 19:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-21 19:59   ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-11-21 20:11     ` Kevin Buettner
2003-11-21 20:46     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-21 20:48       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-21 20:55         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-21 21:04           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-21 21:24             ` Kevin Buettner
2003-11-21 21:54               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-21 22:40                 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-11-22  0:37             ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-22  0:41               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-21 20:07   ` David Carlton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031121195949.GA794@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox