Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa:symtab] deprecate inside_entry_func
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 00:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031101004233.GA11987@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FA2F940.5040102@redhat.com>

On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 07:07:28PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This patch deprecates the function inside_entry_func.  Per the new comments:
> 
> +  /* NOTE: cagney/2003-10-31: A very simple test, such as
> +     get_frame_func == entry_point should be sufficient for
> +     identifying a pc in the entry function.  Does anyone know why it
> +     wasn't sufficient and hence, why the very convoluted
> +     "deprecated_inside_entry_func" is needed.  */
> +  /* NOTE: cagney/2003-10-31: An ABI and its crt0 code should define
> +     and implement a clean frame termination.  Not doing that is
> +     really a bug in the ABI/crt0, and, hence, not a reason for
> +     enabling the call to deprecated_inside_entry_func.  */

If handling broken systems isn't the job of GDB, then I surely don't
know what is.

Do you have a reason for wanting to deprecate this function?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-11-01  0:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-01  0:07 Andrew Cagney
2003-11-01  0:37 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-11-01  0:46   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-01  0:55     ` Kevin Buettner
2003-11-01  2:27       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-07 17:31         ` Kevin Buettner
2003-11-07 21:25           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-01  0:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-11-01  2:37   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-09  0:13     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-09  2:40       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-09  3:50         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-21 19:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-21 19:59   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-21 20:11     ` Kevin Buettner
2003-11-21 20:46     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-21 20:48       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-21 20:55         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-21 21:04           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-21 21:24             ` Kevin Buettner
2003-11-21 21:54               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-21 22:40                 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-11-22  0:37             ` Andrew Cagney
2003-11-22  0:41               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-11-21 20:07   ` David Carlton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031101004233.GA11987@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox