Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Anderson <davea@quasar.engr.sgi.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: drow@mvista.com, kevinb@redhat.com, cgd@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [WIP/RFC] MIPS registers overhaul
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 20:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200305212057.NAA43443@quasar.engr.sgi.com> (raw)


Andrew Cagney
|> The fact that a specific remote debug agent choses to use 32 bit 
|> registers is a limitation of that debug agent / kernel.  An embedded 
|> target, and I'm pretty sure IRIX 6.5, for instance, don't do that.

Daniel Jacobowitz
|No, from GDB's view point in this situation, the target ISA is _NOT_ 64
|bit.  Nothing 64-bit is available, either to the inferior or to the
|debugger.  Period.
|
|I would be a little surprised if IRIX didn't work that way too, but I
|don't have access to IRIX to poke around.


IRIX has always defined the interface  with /proc as
the higher of the ABI of
	the debugger (requesting /proc operations)
	the victim app (operated-on)

So gdb built -64 sees all IRIX /proc interfaces  producing
the same sort of results whether  the victim app is
o32 n32 or 64 (lowest to highest on IRIX).


Regards,
David B. Anderson davea@sgi.com http://reality.sgiweb.org/davea


             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-21 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-21 20:58 David Anderson [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-10  0:25 Kevin Buettner
2003-05-10 20:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-10 20:40   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-14 22:00   ` Kevin Buettner
     [not found]     ` <mailpost.1052949911.28802@news-sj1-1>
2003-05-14 23:35       ` cgd
2003-05-15  0:07         ` Kevin Buettner
2003-05-15  0:15           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-15 22:01     ` Kevin Buettner
2003-05-16  3:24       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-16  4:00     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-16 17:20       ` Kevin Buettner
     [not found]       ` <mailpost.1053057614.17325@news-sj1-1>
2003-05-16 22:25         ` cgd
     [not found]           ` <mailpost.1053123913.16634@news-sj1-1>
2003-05-16 22:50             ` cgd
2003-05-16 23:05               ` Kevin Buettner
     [not found]                 ` <mailpost.1053126410.17856@news-sj1-1>
2003-05-16 23:24                   ` cgd
2003-05-17  0:41                     ` Kevin Buettner
2003-05-17 20:59                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
     [not found]                       ` <mailpost.1053132070.20348@news-sj1-1>
2003-05-20 20:37                         ` cgd
2003-05-20 20:51                           ` Kevin Buettner
2003-05-20 20:52                           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-20 21:57                             ` cgd
2003-05-21 15:34                               ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-21 15:41                                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-21 16:38                                   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-21 16:58                                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-21 18:32                                       ` Kevin Buettner
2003-05-21 19:15                                         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-21 19:45                                           ` Kevin Buettner
2003-05-22  0:32                                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-23 18:39                                             ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-23 19:02                                               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-23 20:45                                                 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-20 20:25               ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-20 20:32                 ` cgd
2003-05-21 15:40                   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-15  1:44                     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-16 18:06                       ` cgd
2003-06-16 18:47                         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-15 17:23                   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-16 20:06                     ` cgd
2003-06-16 20:41                       ` Andrew Cagney
     [not found]                         ` <mailpost.1055796186.4097@news-sj1-1>
2003-06-17  5:04                           ` cgd
2003-06-17 14:27                             ` Andrew Cagney
     [not found]                               ` <mailpost.1055860052.3406@news-sj1-1>
2003-06-17 16:27                                 ` cgd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200305212057.NAA43443@quasar.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=davea@quasar.engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=cgd@broadcom.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox