Re: [patch/rfa] Drop some arm-* targets

[Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>]

On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 03:45:50PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>The attached patch prunes the number of ARM targets to build when checking 
>>that a change doesn't badly break things.  I think dropping arm-coff is 
>>pretty obvious since it and arm-elf should be the same.
>>
>>Not so obvious is arm-pe - Chris, thoughts?
>
>Chris is ok with this so I've checked it in.

Actually, maybe it's a corollary of the above, bu I think we should
obsolete the WinCE targets.  So the files wince.c, wince-stub.c, and
wince-stub.h should go.  These files are also used for mips-pe and
sh-pe.

I guess I'm sort of the maintainer of these packages but I really don't
have any interest in maintaining them.  AFAIK, both binutils and gcc both
are no longer capable of building Windows CE binaries.

cgf

>>2001-12-30  Andrew Cagney  <ac131313@redhat.com>
>>
>>* MAINTAINERS: Remove arm-coff and arm-pe from target list.
>>
>>Index: MAINTAINERS
>>===================================================================
>>RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/MAINTAINERS,v
>>retrieving revision 1.136
>>diff -p -r1.136 MAINTAINERS
>>*** MAINTAINERS	2001/12/24 20:07:01	1.136
>>--- MAINTAINERS	2001/12/29 19:25:27
>>*************** maintainer works with the native maintai
>>*** 60,66 ****
>>  	arc		--target=arc-elf ,-Werror
>>  			Maintenance only
>>  
>>! 	arm		--target=arm-coff,arm-elf,arm-pe -w
>>  			Fernando Nasser		fnasser@redhat.com
>>Scott Bambrough		scottb@netwinder.org
>>--- 60,66 ----
>>  	arc		--target=arc-elf ,-Werror
>>  			Maintenance only
>>  
>>! 	arm		--target=arm-elf -w
>>  			Fernando Nasser		fnasser@redhat.com
>>Scott Bambrough		scottb@netwinder.org
>>
>
>

-- 
cgf@redhat.com                        Red Hat, Inc.
http://sources.redhat.com/            http://www.redhat.com/