Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
To: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfa] Drop some arm-* targets
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 07:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15426.62701.20809.217549@localhost.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020113212834.GB23817@redhat.com>

Christopher Faylor writes:
 > On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 03:45:50PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
 > >>Hello,
 > >>
 > >>The attached patch prunes the number of ARM targets to build when checking 
 > >>that a change doesn't badly break things.  I think dropping arm-coff is 
 > >>pretty obvious since it and arm-elf should be the same.
 > >>
 > >>Not so obvious is arm-pe - Chris, thoughts?
 > >
 > >Chris is ok with this so I've checked it in.
 > 
 > Actually, maybe it's a corollary of the above, bu I think we should
 > obsolete the WinCE targets.  So the files wince.c, wince-stub.c, and
 > wince-stub.h should go.  These files are also used for mips-pe and
 > sh-pe.

Some WCE specific ifdefs have been already deleted from sh-tdep.c,
back in May 2001. So yes, kill them.

Elena


 > 
 > I guess I'm sort of the maintainer of these packages but I really don't
 > have any interest in maintaining them.  AFAIK, both binutils and gcc both
 > are no longer capable of building Windows CE binaries.
 > 
 > cgf
 > 
 > >>2001-12-30  Andrew Cagney  <ac131313@redhat.com>
 > >>
 > >>* MAINTAINERS: Remove arm-coff and arm-pe from target list.
 > >>
 > >>Index: MAINTAINERS
 > >>===================================================================
 > >>RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/MAINTAINERS,v
 > >>retrieving revision 1.136
 > >>diff -p -r1.136 MAINTAINERS
 > >>*** MAINTAINERS	2001/12/24 20:07:01	1.136
 > >>--- MAINTAINERS	2001/12/29 19:25:27
 > >>*************** maintainer works with the native maintai
 > >>*** 60,66 ****
 > >>  	arc		--target=arc-elf ,-Werror
 > >>  			Maintenance only
 > >>  
 > >>! 	arm		--target=arm-coff,arm-elf,arm-pe -w
 > >>  			Fernando Nasser		fnasser@redhat.com
 > >>Scott Bambrough		scottb@netwinder.org
 > >>--- 60,66 ----
 > >>  	arc		--target=arc-elf ,-Werror
 > >>  			Maintenance only
 > >>  
 > >>! 	arm		--target=arm-elf -w
 > >>  			Fernando Nasser		fnasser@redhat.com
 > >>Scott Bambrough		scottb@netwinder.org
 > >>
 > >
 > >
 > 
 > -- 
 > cgf@redhat.com                        Red Hat, Inc.
 > http://sources.redhat.com/            http://www.redhat.com/


  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-14 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-29 11:34 Andrew Cagney
2002-01-13 12:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-13 13:28   ` Christopher Faylor
2002-01-14  7:58     ` Elena Zannoni [this message]
2002-01-14 17:30     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-14 17:42       ` Christopher Faylor
2002-01-14 17:49         ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15426.62701.20809.217549@localhost.cygnus.com \
    --to=ezannoni@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgf@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox