From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
To: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfa] Drop some arm-* targets
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 07:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15426.62701.20809.217549@localhost.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020113212834.GB23817@redhat.com>
Christopher Faylor writes:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 03:45:50PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>The attached patch prunes the number of ARM targets to build when checking
> >>that a change doesn't badly break things. I think dropping arm-coff is
> >>pretty obvious since it and arm-elf should be the same.
> >>
> >>Not so obvious is arm-pe - Chris, thoughts?
> >
> >Chris is ok with this so I've checked it in.
>
> Actually, maybe it's a corollary of the above, bu I think we should
> obsolete the WinCE targets. So the files wince.c, wince-stub.c, and
> wince-stub.h should go. These files are also used for mips-pe and
> sh-pe.
Some WCE specific ifdefs have been already deleted from sh-tdep.c,
back in May 2001. So yes, kill them.
Elena
>
> I guess I'm sort of the maintainer of these packages but I really don't
> have any interest in maintaining them. AFAIK, both binutils and gcc both
> are no longer capable of building Windows CE binaries.
>
> cgf
>
> >>2001-12-30 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
> >>
> >>* MAINTAINERS: Remove arm-coff and arm-pe from target list.
> >>
> >>Index: MAINTAINERS
> >>===================================================================
> >>RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/MAINTAINERS,v
> >>retrieving revision 1.136
> >>diff -p -r1.136 MAINTAINERS
> >>*** MAINTAINERS 2001/12/24 20:07:01 1.136
> >>--- MAINTAINERS 2001/12/29 19:25:27
> >>*************** maintainer works with the native maintai
> >>*** 60,66 ****
> >> arc --target=arc-elf ,-Werror
> >> Maintenance only
> >>
> >>! arm --target=arm-coff,arm-elf,arm-pe -w
> >> Fernando Nasser fnasser@redhat.com
> >>Scott Bambrough scottb@netwinder.org
> >>--- 60,66 ----
> >> arc --target=arc-elf ,-Werror
> >> Maintenance only
> >>
> >>! arm --target=arm-elf -w
> >> Fernando Nasser fnasser@redhat.com
> >>Scott Bambrough scottb@netwinder.org
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> cgf@redhat.com Red Hat, Inc.
> http://sources.redhat.com/ http://www.redhat.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-14 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-29 11:34 Andrew Cagney
2002-01-13 12:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-13 13:28 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-01-14 7:58 ` Elena Zannoni [this message]
2002-01-14 17:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-14 17:42 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-01-14 17:49 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15426.62701.20809.217549@localhost.cygnus.com \
--to=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=cgf@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox