From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31907 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2002 15:58:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31759 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2002 15:58:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2002 15:58:03 -0000 Received: from localhost.cygnus.com (cse.sfbay.redhat.com [205.180.230.236]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA13909; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 07:57:49 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ezannoni@localhost) by localhost.cygnus.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g0EFAb501568; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:10:37 -0500 From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15426.62701.20809.217549@localhost.cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 07:58:00 -0000 To: Christopher Faylor Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfa] Drop some arm-* targets In-Reply-To: <20020113212834.GB23817@redhat.com> References: <3C2E1ABD.8070207@cygnus.com> <3C41F1FE.1060902@cygnus.com> <20020113212834.GB23817@redhat.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under Emacs 20.7.1 X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00389.txt.bz2 Christopher Faylor writes: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 03:45:50PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>The attached patch prunes the number of ARM targets to build when checking > >>that a change doesn't badly break things. I think dropping arm-coff is > >>pretty obvious since it and arm-elf should be the same. > >> > >>Not so obvious is arm-pe - Chris, thoughts? > > > >Chris is ok with this so I've checked it in. > > Actually, maybe it's a corollary of the above, bu I think we should > obsolete the WinCE targets. So the files wince.c, wince-stub.c, and > wince-stub.h should go. These files are also used for mips-pe and > sh-pe. Some WCE specific ifdefs have been already deleted from sh-tdep.c, back in May 2001. So yes, kill them. Elena > > I guess I'm sort of the maintainer of these packages but I really don't > have any interest in maintaining them. AFAIK, both binutils and gcc both > are no longer capable of building Windows CE binaries. > > cgf > > >>2001-12-30 Andrew Cagney > >> > >>* MAINTAINERS: Remove arm-coff and arm-pe from target list. > >> > >>Index: MAINTAINERS > >>=================================================================== > >>RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/MAINTAINERS,v > >>retrieving revision 1.136 > >>diff -p -r1.136 MAINTAINERS > >>*** MAINTAINERS 2001/12/24 20:07:01 1.136 > >>--- MAINTAINERS 2001/12/29 19:25:27 > >>*************** maintainer works with the native maintai > >>*** 60,66 **** > >> arc --target=arc-elf ,-Werror > >> Maintenance only > >> > >>! arm --target=arm-coff,arm-elf,arm-pe -w > >> Fernando Nasser fnasser@redhat.com > >>Scott Bambrough scottb@netwinder.org > >>--- 60,66 ---- > >> arc --target=arc-elf ,-Werror > >> Maintenance only > >> > >>! arm --target=arm-elf -w > >> Fernando Nasser fnasser@redhat.com > >>Scott Bambrough scottb@netwinder.org > >> > > > > > > -- > cgf@redhat.com Red Hat, Inc. > http://sources.redhat.com/ http://www.redhat.com/