From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30304 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2002 21:28:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30272 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2002 21:28:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (12.107.208.154) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2002 21:28:17 -0000 Received: from cgf.cipe.redhat.com (dhcpd206.meridian.redhat.com [172.16.47.206]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g0DLSGE27636 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:28:16 -0500 Received: (from cgf@localhost) by cgf.cipe.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) id g0DLSYl30946 for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:28:34 -0500 Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 13:28:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfa] Drop some arm-* targets Message-ID: <20020113212834.GB23817@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3C2E1ABD.8070207@cygnus.com> <3C41F1FE.1060902@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C41F1FE.1060902@cygnus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00362.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 03:45:50PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: >>Hello, >> >>The attached patch prunes the number of ARM targets to build when checking >>that a change doesn't badly break things. I think dropping arm-coff is >>pretty obvious since it and arm-elf should be the same. >> >>Not so obvious is arm-pe - Chris, thoughts? > >Chris is ok with this so I've checked it in. Actually, maybe it's a corollary of the above, bu I think we should obsolete the WinCE targets. So the files wince.c, wince-stub.c, and wince-stub.h should go. These files are also used for mips-pe and sh-pe. I guess I'm sort of the maintainer of these packages but I really don't have any interest in maintaining them. AFAIK, both binutils and gcc both are no longer capable of building Windows CE binaries. cgf >>2001-12-30 Andrew Cagney >> >>* MAINTAINERS: Remove arm-coff and arm-pe from target list. >> >>Index: MAINTAINERS >>=================================================================== >>RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/MAINTAINERS,v >>retrieving revision 1.136 >>diff -p -r1.136 MAINTAINERS >>*** MAINTAINERS 2001/12/24 20:07:01 1.136 >>--- MAINTAINERS 2001/12/29 19:25:27 >>*************** maintainer works with the native maintai >>*** 60,66 **** >> arc --target=arc-elf ,-Werror >> Maintenance only >> >>! arm --target=arm-coff,arm-elf,arm-pe -w >> Fernando Nasser fnasser@redhat.com >>Scott Bambrough scottb@netwinder.org >>--- 60,66 ---- >> arc --target=arc-elf ,-Werror >> Maintenance only >> >>! arm --target=arm-elf -w >> Fernando Nasser fnasser@redhat.com >>Scott Bambrough scottb@netwinder.org >> > > -- cgf@redhat.com Red Hat, Inc. http://sources.redhat.com/ http://www.redhat.com/