From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Eliminate EXTRA_FRAME_INFO & FRAME_FIND_SAVED_REGS
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 07:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200201131528.PAA21457@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 12 Jan 2002 10:46:26 MST." <1020112174626.ZM14727@localhost.localdomain>
> On Jan 12, 11:50am, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
> > This patch eliminates the deprecated macros EXTRA_FRAME_INFO &
> > FRAME_FIND_SAVED_REGS from the arm target support files and replaces them
> > with the new methods for doing this.
>
> I submitted a patch to do this last month. Unfortunately, the ARM
> maintainers have not had a chance to review it yet.
>
> See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-12/msg00397.html
>
> Kevin
Argh! Sorry Kevin, I'd missed that patch, and it isn't in the list of
posts I'd hung on to (actually, I'd already left for Xmas by that point,
so it was probably part of the 5000 or so emails I had to skim when I got
back in January ;-(.
Hmm, it seems substantially the same as mine, but with a couple of minor
differences.
1) You don't seem to initialize the pointer fields in the static frame
structure "prologue_cache".
2) Similarly you don't seem to be allocating the saved_regs for the
caller_fi frame (arm_frame_chain). You do, however, allocate the
extra_info.
3) You have a cleanup for the extra_info allocated above, which I hadn't
thought about. I think one is also needed for the saved_regs.
R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-13 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-09 5:39 [PATCH] fix inferior_pid argument for arm-netbsd Richard Earnshaw
[not found] ` <rearnsha@arm.com>
2002-01-09 7:40 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-01-09 7:54 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-01-10 9:59 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-01-10 10:38 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-01-12 9:47 ` [PATCH] ARM: Eliminate EXTRA_FRAME_INFO & FRAME_FIND_SAVED_REGS Kevin Buettner
2002-01-13 7:28 ` Richard Earnshaw [this message]
2002-01-13 9:32 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-01-13 10:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-13 11:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-13 11:48 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-01-13 11:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-14 2:18 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-01-12 3:51 Richard Earnshaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200201131528.PAA21457@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=rearnsha@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox