Re: [RFA] correct XMM register positions for win32.

[Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>]

Please check this in, Pierre.

Also, please use 'diff -up' or 'diff -cp' for your future patches.

cgf

On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 03:50:14PM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote:
>   Thanks to Momchil Velikov,
>Windows seems indeed to use FXSAVE 
>assemlber instruction to fill the ExtendedRegisters
>array.
>
>   The same instruction with the same layout seems to be used
>by the Pentium clones (at least for AMD).  
>
>Thus the offset changed below are now 
>tested and conform to the FXSAVE
>instruction.
>
>
>2001-11-30 Pierre Muller  <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
>	* win32-nat.c (mappings): Correct position of XMM registers,
>	based on FXSAVE instruction structure.
>
>Index: win32-nat.c
>===================================================================
>RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/win32-nat.c,v
>retrieving revision 1.40
>diff -r1.40 win32-nat.c
>182,191c182,191
><   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[0*16]),
><   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[1*16]),
><   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[2*16]),
><   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[3*16]),
><   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[4*16]),
><   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[5*16]),
><   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[6*16]),
><   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[7*16]),
><   /* MXCSR untested */
><   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[8*16])
>---
> >   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[10*16]),
> >   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[11*16]),
> >   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[12*16]),
> >   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[13*16]),
> >   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[14*16]),
> >   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[15*16]),
> >   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[16*16]),
> >   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[17*16]),
> >   /* MXCSR */
> >   context_offset (ExtendedRegisters[24])