Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@arm.com>
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/11] Add IA64_MAX_REGISTER_SIZE
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:57:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <195F35BF-5B7D-491B-A3EA-1CC039CAA083@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <861sqx300d.fsf@gmail.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 1776 bytes --]


> On 6 Jun 2017, at 11:04, Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@arm.com> writes:
> 
>> Tested on a --enable-targets=all and --enable-libsanitizer build using
> 
> Beside --enable-targets=all, do you configure with --enable-64-bit-bfd?
> 

Yes.

> Why do you configure with --enable-libsanitizer?  It is a top-level
> configure option which enables to build libsanitizer.  What we need here
> is to build GDB with ASAN like this,
> 
> $ make CXXFLAGS='-fsanitize=address' gdb
> 
> and run gdb.gdb/unittest.exp.

Sorry, my mistake. 
I’ve rebuild using the above, and unittest.exp passes.

This also applies to my other 3 patches I’ve posted. My git log includes
all of those patches.

> 
>> 
>> 
>> diff --git a/gdb/ia64-tdep.c b/gdb/ia64-tdep.c
>> index 7282acb20ac2c25e7f2c48fec3106300c385679f..d396fb81a62b0c2522900fd9cb0980aa2a5fb767 100644
>> --- a/gdb/ia64-tdep.c
>> +++ b/gdb/ia64-tdep.c
>> @@ -125,6 +125,9 @@ static CORE_ADDR ia64_find_global_pointer (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
>> 
>> #define NUM_IA64_RAW_REGS 462
>> 
>> +/* Big enough to hold a FP register in bytes.  */
>> +#define IA64_FP_REGISTER_SIZE 16
> 
> Nit, we can replace one magic number 128 with this macro in ia64_ext_type,
> 
>  if (!tdep->ia64_ext_type)
>    tdep->ia64_ext_type
>      = arch_float_type (gdbarch, 128, "builtin_type_ia64_ext",
> 			 floatformats_ia64_ext);

I’m not sure about this. Other files in gdb use things like 
gdbarch_long_double_bit (gdbarch) instead of 128, which sounds a better solution.
Therefore, I’ve left it as it is for now.

> 
> Patch is OK if there is no fail in gdb.gdb/unittest.exp.
> 

Committed as originally posted.



Alan.

\x16º&Öéj×!zÊÞ¶êç×\x7fyÛib²Ö«r\x18\x1dn–­r\x17¬

      reply	other threads:[~2017-06-06 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-04 10:12 Alan Hayward
2017-04-05 10:00 ` Yao Qi
2017-04-11 12:47   ` Alan Hayward
2017-04-11 17:17     ` Yao Qi
2017-04-12 13:41       ` Alan Hayward
2017-04-25 16:08         ` Yao Qi
2017-04-26 10:38           ` Alan Hayward
2017-04-27 10:17             ` Yao Qi
2017-04-27 10:48               ` Alan Hayward
     [not found]                 ` <79E51549-1B65-4DA8-891A-17EF061E03A3@arm.com>
2017-06-06 10:04                   ` Yao Qi
2017-06-06 12:57                     ` Alan Hayward [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=195F35BF-5B7D-491B-A3EA-1CC039CAA083@arm.com \
    --to=alan.hayward@arm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox