Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Remove type prefix for -var-evaluate-expression/functions
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17434.35140.456146.649459@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (raw)


> > > the following patch removes 'type prefix' from output of
> > > -var-evaluate-expression applied to objects of function type (not
> > > pointers to functions, but functions).
> > > 
> > > It causes no regression in the testsuite for me.
> > 
> > But I guess a new test would help prevent a regression (in the code) in
> > the future.
> 
> Yes, can you suggest which file should I add this new testcase too?

Well I guess mi-var-cmd.exp.  Please remember that I'm not the maintainer
but just an interested party.  See what Daniel says.  He might want something
for mi2-var-cmd.exp too.


> > > +  if (TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_FUNC)
> > 
> > This condition must always be true here (case TYPE_CODE_FUNC:).
> 
> This chunk is in 'c_value_print', where there's no switch.      

Ah yes!  I misread the patch.

> I guess I'd better send the patch with "-p". It's attached, hopefully it's
> more clear.

> And thanks for the hint about -p!

Hmm...yes, I guess I've proved my own point.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob


PS I'm not subscribed to gdb-patches so please include me in your replies.
I think its fairly standard to do this as its more inconvenient to get no
reply, than get two and have to delete one.


             reply	other threads:[~2006-03-17 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-17 14:33 Nick Roberts [this message]
2006-03-17 15:03 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-03-18  1:26   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-04  7:18     ` Vladimir Prus
2006-05-05 20:47       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-17 10:20 Nick Roberts
2006-03-17 10:42 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-03-15 16:27 Vladimir Prus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17434.35140.456146.649459@kahikatea.snap.net.nz \
    --to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox