Re: GDB CVS won't build on OSF4.0's cc

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>]

Alexandre Oliva writes:
 > On Mar 20, 2002, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> wrote:
 > 
 > > Andrew Cagney writes:
 > 
 > >> > Other than the one that came with the patch posted to this mailing
 > >> > list?  I don't think so?  Should I create one, install the patch and
 > >> > then close it?
 > >> 
 > >> I counted 4 or 5!  You should look at gdb/390, there may still be 
 > >> ``issues''.
 > 
 > > There is also 294 (which is essentially a duplicate of 390).  Alex,
 > > can you take a look? Maybe your configury test needs to be made a bit
 > > more sophisticated.
 > 
 > This is a totally different subject.  This patch is for a build error
 > on OSF1/DU/Tru64.  Both PRs you mention are about TOC problems on
 > AIX.


Sorry! Both Andrew and I were thinking of this other thread:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2002-02/msg00059.html

 > 
 > >> > I'm not aware of such GDB policies :-(
 > 
 > >> I think people doing this are viewed in a positive light (however there 
 > >> isn't any strict requirement :-).
 > 
 > I never thought such a simple patch would take so long to get in (my
 > fault; I dropped the ball in revising the patch as requested for a
 > long while).  Anyway, when a patch is ready, I see little value in
 > creating a PR.  To me, it feels like pure overhead.  If you have a
 > different opinion, please enlighten me :-)
 > 

Are any of the priority==high bugs related to this (as opposed to the
minimal-toc) problem?

Elena


 > -- 
 > Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
 > Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
 > CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
 > Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer