Re: GDB CVS won't build on OSF4.0's cc

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>]

Alexandre Oliva writes:
 > On Mar 19, 2002, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> wrote:
 > 
 > > OK, I think this is fine now, but you forgot one PTR in defs.h, see
 > > below.
 > 
 > It was not forgotten, but rather intentionally left in.  Since some
 > compilers are picky about differences between PTR and void*, and there
 > still are a number of function definitions and declarations that used
 > PTR, I thought I wouldn't take such a bold step at this time.
 > 

Ok, then. 

 > > Check it in, thanks.
 > 
 > Mainline and 5.2 branch?
 > 

I think build failures fixes qualify for 5.2. Is there a bug report
for this?

Elena

 > -- 
 > Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
 > Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
 > CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
 > Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer