Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] btrace: check for indirect jump return in _Unwind_RaiseException
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 07:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1538034149-12136-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> (raw)

Some versions of _Unwind_RaiseException, e.g. on Fedora 28, use an
indirect jump to return to the exception handler.

This messes up the output of "record function-call-history /c" since the
return is interpreted as cross-function goto.  It had been detected by
gdb.btrace/exception.exp.

Add a heuristic for "_Unwind_*" functions to interpret an indirect jump
that ends in one of our caller functions as return to the first instance
of that function in our call stack.

Signed-off-by: Markus Metzger  <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>

gdb/
	* btrace.c (ftrace_update_function): Add indirect jump heuristic.
---
 gdb/btrace.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gdb/btrace.c b/gdb/btrace.c
index e25f047ce24..d3ad0ab7de8 100644
--- a/gdb/btrace.c
+++ b/gdb/btrace.c
@@ -620,6 +620,20 @@ ftrace_update_function (struct btrace_thread_info *btinfo, CORE_ADDR pc)
 	    if (start == pc)
 	      return ftrace_new_tailcall (btinfo, mfun, fun);
 
+	    /* Some versions of _Unwind_RaiseException use an indirect
+	       jump to 'return' to the exception handler of the caller
+	       handling the exception instead of a return.  Let's restrict
+	       this heuristic to that and related functions.  */
+	    const char *fname = ftrace_print_function_name (bfun);
+	    if (strncmp (fname, "_Unwind_", strlen ("_Unwind_")) == 0)
+	      {
+		struct btrace_function *caller
+		  = ftrace_find_call_by_number (btinfo, bfun->up);
+		caller = ftrace_find_caller (btinfo, caller, mfun, fun);
+		if (caller != NULL)
+		  return ftrace_new_return (btinfo, mfun, fun);
+	      }
+
 	    /* If we can't determine the function for PC, we treat a jump at
 	       the end of the block as tail call if we're switching functions
 	       and as an intra-function branch if we don't.  */
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2018-09-27  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-27  7:42 Markus Metzger [this message]
2018-09-27  7:44 ` [PATCH] testsuite: fix is_amd64_regs_target Markus Metzger
2018-09-27 21:10   ` Tom Tromey
2018-09-28  7:07     ` Metzger, Markus T
2018-09-28 17:34       ` Tom Tromey
     [not found]         ` <8a5ded70-add4-df1d-5f7f-6f7682d58059@ericsson.com>
2018-09-29 18:09           ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1538034149-12136-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
    --to=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox