From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] H8/300: Fix gdb<->sim register mapping.
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392208927-15739-2-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392208927-15739-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com>
Currently, printing the H8/300 ccr register when debugging with the
sim is broken:
(gdb) target sim
...
(gdb) load
...
(gdb) start
...
Breakpoint 1, foo (i=0x0 <foo>) at main.c:4
4 {
(gdb) info registers ccr
Register 13 is not available
'13' is the ccr pseudo-register. This pseudo-register provides an
8-bit view into the raw ccr register (regno=8).
The problem is that the H8/300 port does not define a
register_sim_regno gdbarch hook, and thus when fetching the raw
register off of the sim, we end up in legacy_register_sim_regno trying
to figure out the sim register number for the raw CCR register:
int
legacy_register_sim_regno (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regnum)
{
/* Only makes sense to supply raw registers. */
gdb_assert (regnum >= 0 && regnum < gdbarch_num_regs (gdbarch));
/* NOTE: cagney/2002-05-13: The old code did it this way and it is
suspected that some GDB/SIM combinations may rely on this
behavour. The default should be one2one_register_sim_regno
(below). */
if (gdbarch_register_name (gdbarch, regnum) != NULL
&& gdbarch_register_name (gdbarch, regnum)[0] != '\0')
return regnum;
else
return LEGACY_SIM_REGNO_IGNORE;
}
Because the raw ccr register does not have a name (so that it is
hidden from the user), that returns LEGACY_SIM_REGNO_IGNORE. That
means that we never actually read the value of the raw ccr register.
Before the <unavailable> support, this must have meant that ccr was
_always_ read as 0... At least, I'm not seeing how this ever worked.
The fix for that is adding a gdbarch_register_sim_regno hook that maps
all raw registers. Looking at sim/h8300/sim-main.h, I believe the
sim's register numbers are compatible with gdb's, so no actual
convertion is necessary.
gdb/
2014-02-12 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* h8300-tdep.c (h8300_register_sim_regno): New function.
(h8300_gdbarch_init): Install h8300_register_sim_regno as
gdbarch_register_sim_regno hook.
---
gdb/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++
gdb/h8300-tdep.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index bb977b5..6f0f903 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2014-02-12 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
+
+ * h8300-tdep.c (h8300_register_sim_regno): New function.
+ (h8300_gdbarch_init): Install h8300_register_sim_regno as
+ gdbarch_register_sim_regno hook.
+
2014-02-12 Sanimir Agovic <sanimir.agovic@intel.com>
* nios2-tdep.c (nios2_stub_frame_base): Remove global.
diff --git a/gdb/h8300-tdep.c b/gdb/h8300-tdep.c
index ffffbc9..4193287 100644
--- a/gdb/h8300-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/h8300-tdep.c
@@ -939,6 +939,22 @@ h8300h_return_value (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct value *function,
static struct cmd_list_element *setmachinelist;
+/* Implementation of 'register_sim_regno' gdbarch method. */
+
+static int
+h8300_register_sim_regno (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regnum)
+{
+ /* Only makes sense to supply raw registers. */
+ gdb_assert (regnum >= 0 && regnum < gdbarch_num_regs (gdbarch));
+
+ /* We hide the raw ccr from the user by making it nameless. Because
+ the default register_sim_regno hook returns
+ LEGACY_SIM_REGNO_IGNORE for unnamed registers, we need to
+ override it. The sim register numbering is compatible with
+ gdb's. */
+ return regnum;
+}
+
static const char *
h8300_register_name (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regno)
{
@@ -1230,6 +1246,8 @@ h8300_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches)
gdbarch = gdbarch_alloc (&info, 0);
+ set_gdbarch_register_sim_regno (gdbarch, h8300_register_sim_regno);
+
switch (info.bfd_arch_info->mach)
{
case bfd_mach_h8300:
--
1.7.11.7
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-12 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-01 12:43 [PATCH] h8300 "info registers" broken Yoshinori Sato
2014-02-04 19:38 ` Pedro Alves
2014-02-05 17:51 ` Yoshinori Sato
2014-02-05 17:59 ` Mark Kettenis
2014-02-08 18:36 ` Yoshinori Sato
2014-02-10 15:53 ` Pedro Alves
2014-02-11 10:29 ` Yoshinori Sato
2014-02-11 11:47 ` Pedro Alves
2014-02-11 13:11 ` Yoshinori Sato
2014-02-12 12:42 ` [PATCH 0/2] H8/300: Fix registers Pedro Alves
2014-02-12 12:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] H8/300: Fix pseudo registers reads/writes Pedro Alves
2014-02-12 12:59 ` Mark Kettenis
2014-02-12 12:42 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1392208927-15739-2-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox