* [PATCH] Remove redundant condition checking.
@ 2013-01-15 9:35 Yao Qi
2013-01-15 21:19 ` Pedro Alves
2013-01-15 21:20 ` Pedro Alves
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yao Qi @ 2013-01-15 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Hi,
Just find here is another redundant checking,
if (lwp->bp_reinsert != 0) <-- [1]
{
if (debug_threads)
fprintf (stderr, " pending reinsert at 0x%s\n",
paddress (lwp->bp_reinsert));
if (lwp->bp_reinsert != 0 && can_hardware_single_step ()) <-- [2]
This patch is to remove the redundant one in [2].
gdb/gdbserver:
2013-01-15 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
* linux-low.c (linux_resume_one_lwp): Don't check
'(lwp->bp_reinsert != 0'.
---
gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
index 89988eb..8988509 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
+++ b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
@@ -3192,7 +3192,7 @@ linux_resume_one_lwp (struct lwp_info *lwp,
fprintf (stderr, " pending reinsert at 0x%s\n",
paddress (lwp->bp_reinsert));
- if (lwp->bp_reinsert != 0 && can_hardware_single_step ())
+ if (can_hardware_single_step ())
{
if (fast_tp_collecting == 0)
{
--
1.7.7.6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH] Remove redundant condition checking.
@ 2013-01-15 9:31 Yao Qi
2013-01-15 14:38 ` Pedro Alves
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yao Qi @ 2013-01-15 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Hi,
I find a redundant condition checking the infcmd.c:step_once,
if (!single_inst) <--- [1]
{
CORE_ADDR pc;
/* Step at an inlined function behaves like "down". */
if (!skip_subroutines && !single_inst <-- [2]
&& inline_skipped_frames (inferior_ptid))
The condition '!single_inst' is checked in both [1] and [2], but the
checking in [2] is not necessary. This patch is to remove the
checking in [2], because I don't see keep it in [2] helps
understanding the code. It is obvious to me, but the review is still
welcome.
gdb:
2013-01-15 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
* infcmd.c (step_once): Don't check '!single_inst' as it was
check before.
---
gdb/infcmd.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/infcmd.c b/gdb/infcmd.c
index 085903d..fb34ae4 100644
--- a/gdb/infcmd.c
+++ b/gdb/infcmd.c
@@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ step_once (int skip_subroutines, int single_inst, int count, int thread)
CORE_ADDR pc;
/* Step at an inlined function behaves like "down". */
- if (!skip_subroutines && !single_inst
+ if (!skip_subroutines
&& inline_skipped_frames (inferior_ptid))
{
ptid_t resume_ptid;
--
1.7.7.6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Remove redundant condition checking.
2013-01-15 9:31 Yao Qi
@ 2013-01-15 14:38 ` Pedro Alves
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2013-01-15 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yao Qi; +Cc: gdb-patches
On 01/15/2013 09:31 AM, Yao Qi wrote:
> The condition '!single_inst' is checked in both [1] and [2], but the
> checking in [2] is not necessary. This patch is to remove the
> checking in [2], because I don't see keep it in [2] helps
> understanding the code. It is obvious to me, but the review is still
> welcome.
Yes, certainly fine.
> * infcmd.c (step_once): Don't check '!single_inst' as it was
> check before.
"was checked".
--
Pedro Alves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-16 14:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-15 9:35 [PATCH] Remove redundant condition checking Yao Qi
2013-01-15 21:19 ` Pedro Alves
2013-01-15 21:20 ` Pedro Alves
2013-01-16 14:47 ` committed: " Yao Qi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-15 9:31 Yao Qi
2013-01-15 14:38 ` Pedro Alves
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox