From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Pierre Muller <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
Cc: "'Daniel Jacobowitz'" <dan@codesourcery.com>,
"'Ulrich Weigand'" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] About arm-tdep.c arm_in_function_epilogue_p function
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1290088588.7919.1.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002101cb8726$8bbedec0$a33c9c40$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 14:43 +0100, Pierre Muller wrote:
> OK, here is the patch.
>
> As already said, this patch doesn't change anything on
> the testsuite results for a armv7l linux machine.
>
> > Why don't you just post a patch? Then we can assess it as we would all
> > other patches. The comments in the code at this point clearly don't
> > match the code, so something certainly needs fixing.
> >
> > R.
>
Looking at a wider context I think I see what's happened. The block
here is essentially a copy of the block earlier in the function with
s/pc/sp/ applied. Except this one variable wasn't updated properly.
OK.
R
> OK to apply?
>
> 2010-11-18 Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
>
> * arm-tdep.c (arm_in_function_epilogue_p): Fix code when "MOV SP"
> instruction is found.
>
> Index: src/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/arm-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.312
> diff -u -p -r1.312 arm-tdep.c
> --- src/14 Nov 2010 12:10:59 -0000 1.312
> +++ src/gdb/arm-tdep.c 18 Nov 2010 13:35:41 -0000
> @@ -2245,7 +2245,7 @@ arm_in_function_epilogue_p (struct gdbar
> found_stack_adjust = 1;
> else if ((insn & 0x0ffffff0) == 0x01a0d000)
> /* MOV SP. */
> - found_return = 1;
> + found_stack_adjust = 1;
> else if ((insn & 0x0fff0000) == 0x08bd0000)
> /* POP (LDMIA). */
> found_stack_adjust = 1;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-18 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-14 12:19 [RFC] " Pierre Muller
2010-11-16 0:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-11-18 11:07 ` Pierre Muller
2010-11-18 13:27 ` Richard Earnshaw
2010-11-18 13:43 ` [RFA] " Pierre Muller
2010-11-18 13:56 ` Richard Earnshaw [this message]
2010-11-19 8:10 ` Pierre Muller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1290088588.7919.1.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=rearnsha@arm.com \
--cc=dan@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox