From: Luis Machado <luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Watchpoints: support for thread <thread_num> parameters
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1187903715.5106.19.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070823211202.GM7552@adacore.com>
On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 17:12 -0400, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > > Makes sense. So instead of having GDB insert watchpoints in all the
> > > threads, we would insert it just in the one we specified in the command.
> > > That could make use of the changes to the watchpoint command, but then
> > > we're discarding Jeff's patches, right?
> >
> > No, this still requires Jeff's patches as a starting point. I hope
> > to respond to them today.
>
> Another reason why I believe these patches would still be necessary
> is the fact that some targets might not support thread-specific
> hardware watchpoints, right?
>
For that case it's a good idea to have something like the additional
parameter. In time, which ones have such behaviour?
Best regards,
--
Luis Machado
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center
e-mail: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-23 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-16 21:03 Luis Machado
2007-08-17 10:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-17 15:47 ` Luis Machado
2007-08-17 18:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-17 18:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-20 14:28 ` Luis Machado
2007-08-20 14:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-20 15:23 ` Luis Machado
2007-08-20 15:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-23 21:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-08-23 21:15 ` Luis Machado [this message]
2007-10-11 19:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-11 20:33 ` Luis Machado
2007-11-13 14:50 ` Luis Machado
2007-11-13 15:38 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-11-13 22:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-11-14 12:20 ` Luis Machado
2007-11-30 16:10 ` Luis Machado
2007-12-16 21:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-17 13:29 ` Luis Machado
2007-12-19 13:05 ` [RFC/RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/watch_thread_num.exp: Fix test for systems having hidden threads Pierre Muller
2007-12-19 13:56 ` Luis Machado
2007-12-19 14:04 ` Pierre Muller
2007-12-19 14:05 ` 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
2007-12-19 14:55 ` Pierre Muller
2007-12-19 15:04 ` 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1187903715.5106.19.camel@localhost \
--to=luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox