From: Luis Machado <luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Watchpoints: support for thread <thread_num> parameters
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1187618630.4974.5.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070817184953.GA1747@caradoc.them.org>
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 14:49 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 09:41:38PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Is this all that needs to be done to have thread-specific watchpoints?
> > Do they work after this patch as you want them to?
>
> In my opinion, not really. On some systems, you can tell the target
> layer which threads the watchpoint should be inserted for and spare
> yourself extra stops in "wrong" threads.
What do you have in mind regarding the whole feature? Will we head
towards a different solution?
--
Luis Machado
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center
e-mail: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-20 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-16 21:03 Luis Machado
2007-08-17 10:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-17 15:47 ` Luis Machado
2007-08-17 18:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-17 18:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-20 14:28 ` Luis Machado [this message]
2007-08-20 14:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-20 15:23 ` Luis Machado
2007-08-20 15:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-23 21:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-08-23 21:15 ` Luis Machado
2007-10-11 19:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-11 20:33 ` Luis Machado
2007-11-13 14:50 ` Luis Machado
2007-11-13 15:38 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-11-13 22:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-11-14 12:20 ` Luis Machado
2007-11-30 16:10 ` Luis Machado
2007-12-16 21:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-17 13:29 ` Luis Machado
2007-12-19 13:05 ` [RFC/RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/watch_thread_num.exp: Fix test for systems having hidden threads Pierre Muller
2007-12-19 13:56 ` Luis Machado
2007-12-19 14:04 ` Pierre Muller
2007-12-19 14:05 ` 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
2007-12-19 14:55 ` Pierre Muller
2007-12-19 15:04 ` 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1187618630.4974.5.camel@localhost \
--to=luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox