From: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
To: <luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, "'Daniel Jacobowitz'" <drow@false.org>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: [RFC/RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/watch_thread_num.exp: Fix test for systems having hidden threads
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000601c8423e$f49ca010$ddd5e030$@u-strasbg.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1197894945.24027.8.camel@gargoyle>
This test currently fails on cygwin target
and it does by timeout's which means that it takes a lot of time...
The reason of the failure is that
thread #2 is a thread created internally by cygwin,
for posix emulation, and thus never
changes the value of the variable shared_var.
I modified the test so that it does
not suppose that thread 2 is one of the explicitly generated
threads, but instead adds a breakpoint to
thread_function, and reads the thread number of the first
explicitly generated thread.
I also added an iteration number to the final test loop.
I am mainly unsure about the details
required for the ChangeLog entry...
I only tested the patch on Cygwin target where it gives
29 passes, but I expect it to give the same results
on other targets that had no failures before.
One possible problem is about the $expect_out(1,string)
because this is undefined if the first pattern is not found.
But I suppose that this is not unique to my patch,
as lots of gdb_expect calls only have braces
to define a group that will become the $expect_out return values
in only one regular expression.
Is there a coding rule for this?
Pierre Muller
testsuite directory ChangeLog entry
2007-12-19 Pierre Muller <muller@ics-u-strasbg.fr>
* (gdb.base/watch_thread_num.exp): Add breakpoint at
thread_function and record first explicitly generated
thread number.
Use that thread number for thread specific watchpoint test.
Add iteration number to repetitive tests.
$ cat threadwatch.patch
Index: gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/watch_thread_num.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/watch_thread_num.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 watch_thread_num.exp
--- gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/watch_thread_num.exp 17 Dec 2007 12:32:23 -00001.1
+++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/watch_thread_num.exp 19 Dec 2007 08:45:41 -0000
@@ -54,11 +54,28 @@ gdb_test "watch shared_var thread" "A sy
gdb_test "Next 5" ""
-gdb_test "watch shared_var thread 2" "Hardware watchpoint 2: shared_var" "Watch
point on shared variable"
-gdb_test "info breakpoint 2" "stop only in thread 2"
+gdb_test "break thread_function" "Breakpoint \[0-9\].*" \
+ "Set breakpoint at thread_function"
-for {set i 0} {$i < 10} {incr i 1} {
-gdb_test "continue" "Hardware watchpoint 2: shared_var.*" "Watchpoint triggered
"
-gdb_test "thread" "\\\[Current thread is 2 \\\(Thread $hex \\\(LWP $decimal\\\)
\\\)\\\]" "Check thread that triggered"
+gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint 2.*" "Stopped in thread_function"
+
+send_gdb "thread\n"
+gdb_expect {
+ -re ".*Current thread is (\[0-9\]*).*$gdb_prompt $" { pass "Thread command" }
+ -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { fail "Thread command" }
+ timeout { fail "(timeout) Thread command" }
+}
+
+set thread_num "$expect_out(1,string)"
+
+gdb_test "disable 2" "" "Disable breakpoint 2"
+gdb_test "watch shared_var thread $thread_num" "Hardware watchpoint 3: shared_v
ar" "Watchpoint on shared variable"
+gdb_test "info breakpoint 3" "stop only in thread $thread_num"
+
+for {set i 1} {$i <= 10} {incr i 1} {
+gdb_test "continue" "Hardware watchpoint 3: shared_var.*" \
+ "Watchpoint triggered iteration $i"
+gdb_test "thread" ".*Current thread is $thread_num .*" \
+ "Check thread that triggered iteration $i"
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-19 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-16 21:03 [patch] Watchpoints: support for thread <thread_num> parameters Luis Machado
2007-08-17 10:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-17 15:47 ` Luis Machado
2007-08-17 18:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-17 18:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-20 14:28 ` Luis Machado
2007-08-20 14:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-20 15:23 ` Luis Machado
2007-08-20 15:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-23 21:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-08-23 21:15 ` Luis Machado
2007-10-11 19:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-11 20:33 ` Luis Machado
2007-11-13 14:50 ` Luis Machado
2007-11-13 15:38 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-11-13 22:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-11-14 12:20 ` Luis Machado
2007-11-30 16:10 ` Luis Machado
2007-12-16 21:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-17 13:29 ` Luis Machado
2007-12-19 13:05 ` Pierre Muller [this message]
2007-12-19 13:56 ` [RFC/RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/watch_thread_num.exp: Fix test for systems having hidden threads Luis Machado
2007-12-19 14:04 ` Pierre Muller
2007-12-19 14:05 ` 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
2007-12-19 14:55 ` Pierre Muller
2007-12-19 15:04 ` 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000601c8423e$f49ca010$ddd5e030$@u-strasbg.fr' \
--to=muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox