Re: [RFC] Don't lose compilation directory in Dwarf2 line-tables

[Frederic RISS <frederic.riss@st.com>]

On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 09:46 -0700, Jim Blandy wrote:
> On 4/21/06, Frederic RISS <frederic.riss@st.com> wrote:
> > > - Leave the comparison loop alone, as in your last patch.
> > > - If dwarf2_start_subfile does have to start a subfile itself, always
> > > pass comp_dir as start_subfile's second argument, whether it's NULL or
> > > not (because this is what we do when calling start_symtab), and
> > > concatenate dirname, if it's non-null, with filename to get
> > > start_subfile's first argument.  I think this means that 'fullname'
> > > always gets used, so you can hoist that computation and its xfree out
> > > of the 'if'.
> >
> > But then, the loop in dwarf2_start_subfile doesn't serve any purpose,
> > because the loop at the beginning of start_subfile proper will do the
> > same work. Or maybe I'm missing something?
> 
> No --- I hadn't noticed the loop in start_subfile.  That's great!
> 
> > > Either way, this definitely needs a comment.  If you'd like to write
> > > up one yourself, great; if not, that's fine; I'll put one in after
> > > your patch goes in.
> >
> > Attached is a new patch that adds comments and removes the superfluous
> > loop. How's that?
> 
> If it doesn't cause any regressions, it looks great to me!  Thanks very much!

I had regression tested it on i686-linux. I'll check it in in a few
hours time.

Thanks.