Re: [RFC]: win32-nat.c better handling of DLL relocation

["Raoul Gough" <RaoulGough@yahoo.co.uk>]

"Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com> wrote in message
news:20030129152104.GD9107@redhat.com...
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 12:24:31PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 03:52:09PM -0000, Raoul Gough wrote:
> >>2003-01-10  Raoul Gough  <RaoulGough@yahoo.co.uk>
> >>
> >> * win32-nat.c(get_relocated_section_addrs): New function. Find
> >> section load addresses for symbol handling in relocated DLLs.
> >> (solib_symbols_add): Open a bfd and call
get_relocated_section_addrs.
> >
> >I took a quick glance.  Looks good.  Now we just need that pesky
> >assignment.
> >
> ><idle musing>I wonder if there is some way to do all of this
assignment stuff
> >electronically.  It seems silly that we still have to rely on paper
for this
> >kind of thing.</idle musing>
>
> Any word on the assignment front?

The signed assignment forms are currently on their way back to the FSF
in the post. I was concerned about the extent of the first contracts,
and ended up having to get alternate forms sent out. The new forms
have a specified time period for me to make contributions, covering
two years starting from 1 January 2003. I figure that reduces the risk
of "changes and enhancements to the Program" becoming a legal
nightmare for me twenty years from now.

I guess the forms should be arriving back at the FSF in a couple of
days.

Regards,
Raoul Gough.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com