From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9460 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 18:26:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9453 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 18:26:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp014.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.173.58) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 18:26:26 -0000 Received: from du-028-0217.claranet.co.uk (HELO albert) (RaoulGough@195.8.84.217 with login) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 18:26:22 -0000 Message-ID: <005501c2c7c4$0d2d1150$0100a8c0@albert> From: "Raoul Gough" To: Cc: "Christopher Faylor" References: <20030111172431.GA5683@redhat.com> <20030129152104.GD9107@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [RFC]: win32-nat.c better handling of DLL relocation Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:26:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00781.txt.bz2 "Christopher Faylor" wrote in message news:20030129152104.GD9107@redhat.com... > On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 12:24:31PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 03:52:09PM -0000, Raoul Gough wrote: > >>2003-01-10 Raoul Gough > >> > >> * win32-nat.c(get_relocated_section_addrs): New function. Find > >> section load addresses for symbol handling in relocated DLLs. > >> (solib_symbols_add): Open a bfd and call get_relocated_section_addrs. > > > >I took a quick glance. Looks good. Now we just need that pesky > >assignment. > > > >I wonder if there is some way to do all of this assignment stuff > >electronically. It seems silly that we still have to rely on paper for this > >kind of thing. > > Any word on the assignment front? The signed assignment forms are currently on their way back to the FSF in the post. I was concerned about the extent of the first contracts, and ended up having to get alternate forms sent out. The new forms have a specified time period for me to make contributions, covering two years starting from 1 January 2003. I figure that reduces the risk of "changes and enhancements to the Program" becoming a legal nightmare for me twenty years from now. I guess the forms should be arriving back at the FSF in a couple of days. Regards, Raoul Gough. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com