From: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
To: "'Joel Brobecker'" <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz@gnu.org>,
"'Mark Kettenis'" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [RFA-v3] Fix a windows bug if two watchpoints are used
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003f01ca3d63$607027a0$215076e0$@u-strasbg.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090924175356.GF2112@adacore.com>
I only wanted to have the fix in the branch,
I don't insist on having the new testsuite files
in 7.0
I was thinking of resubmitting the
watchpoints.exp and watchpoints.c separately again
for main branch only.
Should I commit all together?
I might be able to test it tomorrow on
a Ubuntu inside VMware.
As you prefer!
Pierre Muller
Pascal language support maintainer for GDB
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Joel Brobecker
> Envoyé : Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:54 PM
> À : Pierre Muller
> Cc : 'Eli Zaretskii'; 'Mark Kettenis'; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Objet : Re: [RFA-v3] Fix a windows bug if two watchpoints are used
>
> > PS: I tested the patch on Compile Farm, on a amd64 linux,
> > no failure on new watchpoints.exp test,
> > nor on CVS head nor with patched version.
>
> I just wanted to make sure that this is relevant to amd64 as well
> as i386... Otherwise, it'd be nice if you could test it on x86 as well
> before committing to the branch (being paranoid, sorry).
>
> Thanks!
> --
> Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-24 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-03 22:58 [RFA] " Pierre Muller
2009-06-03 23:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-03 23:33 ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-04 3:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-04 3:29 ` Christopher Faylor
2009-06-04 6:34 ` [RFA-v2] " Pierre Muller
2009-06-04 7:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-04 7:33 ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-04 10:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-04 14:52 ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-04 15:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-16 22:43 ` [PING][RFA-v2] " Pierre Muller
2009-06-22 20:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-23 1:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-22 12:55 ` [RFA-v3] " Pierre Muller
2009-09-24 3:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-24 17:54 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-24 22:08 ` Pierre Muller [this message]
2009-09-25 1:53 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-25 15:32 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-25 16:07 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003f01ca3d63$607027a0$215076e0$@u-strasbg.fr' \
--to=muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox