Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
To: "'Joel Brobecker'" <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz@gnu.org>,
	        "'Mark Kettenis'" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
	        <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [RFA-v3] Fix a windows bug if two watchpoints are used
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <003f01ca3d63$607027a0$215076e0$@u-strasbg.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090924175356.GF2112@adacore.com>

  I only wanted to have the fix in the branch,
I don't insist on having the new testsuite files
in 7.0

  I was thinking of resubmitting the
watchpoints.exp and watchpoints.c separately again
for main branch only.

  Should I commit all together?
I might be able to test it tomorrow on
a Ubuntu inside VMware.

  As you prefer!


Pierre Muller
Pascal language support maintainer for GDB



> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Joel Brobecker
> Envoyé : Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:54 PM
> À : Pierre Muller
> Cc : 'Eli Zaretskii'; 'Mark Kettenis'; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Objet : Re: [RFA-v3] Fix a windows bug if two watchpoints are used
> 
> > PS: I tested the patch on Compile Farm, on a amd64 linux,
> > no failure on new watchpoints.exp test,
> > nor on CVS head nor with patched version.
> 
> I just wanted to make sure that this is relevant to amd64 as well
> as i386... Otherwise, it'd be nice if you could test it on x86 as well
> before committing to the branch (being paranoid, sorry).
> 
> Thanks!
> --
> Joel


  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-24 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-03 22:58 [RFA] " Pierre Muller
2009-06-03 23:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-03 23:33   ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-04  3:16     ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-04  3:29       ` Christopher Faylor
2009-06-04  6:34       ` [RFA-v2] " Pierre Muller
2009-06-04  7:12         ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-04  7:33           ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-04 10:31             ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-04 14:52               ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-04 15:22                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-16 22:43                   ` [PING][RFA-v2] " Pierre Muller
2009-06-22 20:56                     ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-23  1:04                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-22 12:55                         ` [RFA-v3] " Pierre Muller
2009-09-24  3:04                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-24 17:54                           ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-24 22:08                             ` Pierre Muller [this message]
2009-09-25  1:53                               ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-25 15:32                                 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-25 16:07                                   ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='003f01ca3d63$607027a0$215076e0$@u-strasbg.fr' \
    --to=muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox