From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9608 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2009 22:08:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 9596 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Sep 2009 22:08:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.200.153) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:07:58 +0000 Received: from baal.u-strasbg.fr (baal.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::41]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.2/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n8OM79d0007105 ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:07:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (ms2.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:d::11]) by baal.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.0/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n8OM789S038386 ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:07:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from d620muller (lec67-4-82-230-53-140.fbx.proxad.net [82.230.53.140]) (user=mullerp mech=LOGIN) by mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id n8OM77wQ097903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:07:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr) From: "Pierre Muller" To: "'Joel Brobecker'" Cc: "'Eli Zaretskii'" , "'Mark Kettenis'" , References: <000001c9e4de$6e550cb0$4aff2610$@u-strasbg.fr> <000301c9e4e6$b40c5d50$1c2517f0$@u-strasbg.fr> <001501c9e523$feffc1c0$fcff4540$@u-strasbg.fr> <000301c9eed3$c7239d80$556ad880$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090622205616.GD7766@adacore.com> <000301ca3b83$d15fee00$741fca00$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090924175356.GF2112@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20090924175356.GF2112@adacore.com> Subject: RE: [RFA-v3] Fix a windows bug if two watchpoints are used Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <003f01ca3d63$607027a0$215076e0$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00762.txt.bz2 I only wanted to have the fix in the branch, I don't insist on having the new testsuite files in 7.0 I was thinking of resubmitting the watchpoints.exp and watchpoints.c separately again for main branch only. Should I commit all together? I might be able to test it tomorrow on a Ubuntu inside VMware. As you prefer! Pierre Muller Pascal language support maintainer for GDB > -----Message d'origine----- > De=A0: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches- > owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Joel Brobecker > Envoy=E9=A0: Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:54 PM > =C0=A0: Pierre Muller > Cc=A0: 'Eli Zaretskii'; 'Mark Kettenis'; gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Objet=A0: Re: [RFA-v3] Fix a windows bug if two watchpoints are used >=20 > > PS: I tested the patch on Compile Farm, on a amd64 linux, > > no failure on new watchpoints.exp test, > > nor on CVS head nor with patched version. >=20 > I just wanted to make sure that this is relevant to amd64 as well > as i386... Otherwise, it'd be nice if you could test it on x86 as well > before committing to the branch (being paranoid, sorry). >=20 > Thanks! > -- > Joel