Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA-v2] Fix a windows bug if two watchpoints are used
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:31:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1MCAEM-0005ix-2I@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000301c9e4e6$b40c5d50$1c2517f0$@u-strasbg.fr> 	(muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr)

> From: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
> Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:33:06 +0200
> Content-Language: en-us
> 
>   My problem is indeed fixed without that part,
> but without my change to I386_DR_DISABLE, the second check
> in i386_stopped_data_address:
> 
>   ALL_DEBUG_REGISTERS(i)
>     {
>       if (I386_DR_WATCH_HIT (i)
> 	  /* This second condition makes sure DRi is set up for a data
> 	     watchpoint, not a hardware breakpoint.  The reason is
> 	     that GDB doesn't call the target_stopped_data_address
> 	     method except for data watchpoints.  In other words, I'm
> 	     being paranoiac.  */
> 	  && I386_DR_GET_RW_LEN (i) != 0)
> 
> is not reliable as the return value of I386_DR_GET_RW_LEN (i) 
> is non-zero if I was used before... Even if it was disabled
> later!

This is C: if the result of the first test is false, the result of the
second test is not important, right?

Or am I missing something?


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-04 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-03 22:58 [RFA] " Pierre Muller
2009-06-03 23:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-03 23:33   ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-04  3:16     ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-04  3:29       ` Christopher Faylor
2009-06-04  6:34       ` [RFA-v2] " Pierre Muller
2009-06-04  7:12         ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-04  7:33           ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-04 10:31             ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2009-06-04 14:52               ` Pierre Muller
2009-06-04 15:22                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-16 22:43                   ` [PING][RFA-v2] " Pierre Muller
2009-06-22 20:56                     ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-23  1:04                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-22 12:55                         ` [RFA-v3] " Pierre Muller
2009-09-24  3:04                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-09-24 17:54                           ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-24 22:08                             ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-25  1:53                               ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-25 15:32                                 ` Pierre Muller
2009-09-25 16:07                                   ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1MCAEM-0005ix-2I@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox