Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] Make the error handling in open_channel more readable
@ 2011-02-21 16:55 Yannick Brosseau
  2011-02-23  4:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
       [not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP9165A2945ADE5682920AC096DB0@phx.gbl>
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yannick Brosseau @ 2011-02-21 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)


Signed-off-by: Yannick Brosseau <yannick.brosseau at gmail.com>
---
 libust/buffers.c |    9 ++++-----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libust/buffers.c b/libust/buffers.c
index 4e8004c..534d0ef 100644
--- a/libust/buffers.c
+++ b/libust/buffers.c
@@ -319,12 +319,11 @@ static int open_channel(struct ust_channel *chan, size_t subbuf_size,
 
 	return 0;
 
-	/* Jump directly inside the loop to close the buffers that were already
-	 * opened. */
-	for(; i>=0; i--) {
-		close_buf(chan->buf[i]);
 error:
-		do {} while(0);
+	/* Loop through the opened buffers and close them. Skip the current i, 
+	   since it's the one that did not open. */
+	for(i--; i>=0; i--) {
+		close_buf(chan->buf[i]);
 	}
 
 	pthread_mutex_unlock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
-- 
1.7.2.3




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] Make the error handling in open_channel more readable
  2011-02-21 16:55 [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] Make the error handling in open_channel more readable Yannick Brosseau
@ 2011-02-23  4:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
       [not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP9165A2945ADE5682920AC096DB0@phx.gbl>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2011-02-23  4:06 UTC (permalink / raw)


* Yannick Brosseau (yannick.brosseau at gmail.com) wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yannick Brosseau <yannick.brosseau at gmail.com>
> ---
>  libust/buffers.c |    9 ++++-----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libust/buffers.c b/libust/buffers.c
> index 4e8004c..534d0ef 100644
> --- a/libust/buffers.c
> +++ b/libust/buffers.c
> @@ -319,12 +319,11 @@ static int open_channel(struct ust_channel *chan, size_t subbuf_size,
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> -	/* Jump directly inside the loop to close the buffers that were already
> -	 * opened. */
> -	for(; i>=0; i--) {
> -		close_buf(chan->buf[i]);
>  error:
> -		do {} while(0);
> +	/* Loop through the opened buffers and close them. Skip the current i, 
> +	   since it's the one that did not open. */
> +	for(i--; i>=0; i--) {
> +		close_buf(chan->buf[i]);

Not sure I see how this is more readable. You seem to be changing the
code behavior too.

Mathieu

>  	}
>  
>  	pthread_mutex_unlock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
> -- 
> 1.7.2.3
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] Make the error handling in open_channel more readable
       [not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP9165A2945ADE5682920AC096DB0@phx.gbl>
@ 2011-02-23  4:13   ` Yannick Brosseau
  2011-02-23  4:23     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yannick Brosseau @ 2011-02-23  4:13 UTC (permalink / raw)


On 2011-02-22 23:06, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Yannick Brosseau (yannick.brosseau at gmail.com) wrote:
>   
>> Signed-off-by: Yannick Brosseau <yannick.brosseau at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  libust/buffers.c |    9 ++++-----
>>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libust/buffers.c b/libust/buffers.c
>> index 4e8004c..534d0ef 100644
>> --- a/libust/buffers.c
>> +++ b/libust/buffers.c
>> @@ -319,12 +319,11 @@ static int open_channel(struct ust_channel *chan, size_t subbuf_size,
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>  
>> -	/* Jump directly inside the loop to close the buffers that were already
>> -	 * opened. */
>> -	for(; i>=0; i--) {
>> -		close_buf(chan->buf[i]);
>>  error:
>> -		do {} while(0);
>> +	/* Loop through the opened buffers and close them. Skip the current i, 
>> +	   since it's the one that did not open. */
>> +	for(i--; i>=0; i--) {
>> +		close_buf(chan->buf[i]);
>>     
> Not sure I see how this is more readable. You seem to be changing the
> code behavior too.
>   

At least we don't have a jump un the middle of a loop and a complex nop
operation.
The behavior is the same.

We could also not reuse the i and loop from 0 to i-1.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] Make the error handling in open_channel more readable
  2011-02-23  4:13   ` Yannick Brosseau
@ 2011-02-23  4:23     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2011-02-23  4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)


* Yannick Brosseau (yannick.brosseau at gmail.com) wrote:
> On 2011-02-22 23:06, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Yannick Brosseau (yannick.brosseau at gmail.com) wrote:
> >   
> >> Signed-off-by: Yannick Brosseau <yannick.brosseau at gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  libust/buffers.c |    9 ++++-----
> >>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/libust/buffers.c b/libust/buffers.c
> >> index 4e8004c..534d0ef 100644
> >> --- a/libust/buffers.c
> >> +++ b/libust/buffers.c
> >> @@ -319,12 +319,11 @@ static int open_channel(struct ust_channel *chan, size_t subbuf_size,
> >>  
> >>  	return 0;
> >>  
> >> -	/* Jump directly inside the loop to close the buffers that were already
> >> -	 * opened. */
> >> -	for(; i>=0; i--) {
> >> -		close_buf(chan->buf[i]);
> >>  error:
> >> -		do {} while(0);
> >> +	/* Loop through the opened buffers and close them. Skip the current i, 
> >> +	   since it's the one that did not open. */
> >> +	for(i--; i>=0; i--) {
> >> +		close_buf(chan->buf[i]);
> >>     
> > Not sure I see how this is more readable. You seem to be changing the
> > code behavior too.
> >   
> 
> At least we don't have a jump un the middle of a loop and a complex nop
> operation.
> The behavior is the same.
> 
> We could also not reuse the i and loop from 0 to i-1.
> 

OK, I did coding style updates, but the change has been committed.

Thanks,

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-23  4:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-21 16:55 [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] Make the error handling in open_channel more readable Yannick Brosseau
2011-02-23  4:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
     [not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP9165A2945ADE5682920AC096DB0@phx.gbl>
2011-02-23  4:13   ` Yannick Brosseau
2011-02-23  4:23     ` Mathieu Desnoyers

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox