* [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 2/2] cmm: do not generate code for smp_rmb/smp_wmb on x86_64, smp_rmb on i686
[not found] <BLU0-SMTP2873B9D52621A937B86083961C0@phx.gbl>
@ 2011-09-06 11:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-06 22:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-06 11:50 ` [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 1/2] cmm: let per-arch files provide cmm_smp_* barriers Paolo Bonzini
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2011-09-06 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
Usually we can assume no accesses to write-combining memory occur,
and also that there are no non-temporal load/stores (people would presumably
write those with assembly or intrinsics and put appropriate lfence/sfence
manually). In this case rmb and wmb are no-ops on x86. Define cmm_smp_rmb
and cmm_smp_wmb to be the "common" operations, while leaving cmm_rmb
and cmm_wmb in place for more sophisticated uses.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>
---
urcu/arch/x86.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/urcu/arch/x86.h b/urcu/arch/x86.h
index 9e5411f..69f0416 100644
--- a/urcu/arch/x86.h
+++ b/urcu/arch/x86.h
@@ -33,13 +33,30 @@ extern "C" {
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_HAVE_FENCE
#define cmm_mb() asm volatile("mfence":::"memory")
+
+/*
+ * Define cmm_rmb/cmm_wmb to "strict" barriers that may be needed when
+ * using SSE or working with I/O areas. cmm_smp_rmb/cmm_smp_wmb are
+ * only compiler barriers, which is enough for general use.
+ */
#define cmm_rmb() asm volatile("lfence":::"memory")
#define cmm_wmb() asm volatile("sfence"::: "memory")
+
+/*
+ * An empty cmm_smp_rmb() may not be enough on old PentiumPro multiprocessor
+ * systems, due to an erratum. The Linux kernel says that "Even distro
+ * kernels should think twice before enabling this", but for now let's
+ * be conservative and leave the full barrier on 32-bit processors.
+ */
+#define cmm_smp_rmb() cmm_barrier()
+
+/*
+ * IDT WinChip supports weak store ordering, and the kernel may enable it
+ * under our feet; cmm_smp_wmb() ceases to be a nop for these processors.
+ * However, this never happens on any processor that has *fence instructions.
+ */
+#define cmm_smp_wmb() cmm_barrier()
#else
-/*
- * Some non-Intel clones support out of order store. cmm_wmb() ceases to be a
- * nop for these.
- */
#define cmm_mb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)":::"memory")
#define cmm_rmb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)":::"memory")
#define cmm_wmb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)"::: "memory")
--
1.7.6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 1/2] cmm: let per-arch files provide cmm_smp_* barriers
[not found] <BLU0-SMTP2873B9D52621A937B86083961C0@phx.gbl>
2011-09-06 11:48 ` [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 2/2] cmm: do not generate code for smp_rmb/smp_wmb on x86_64, smp_rmb on i686 Paolo Bonzini
@ 2011-09-06 11:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-10 19:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2011-09-06 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
x86 instructions lfence and sfence are rarely needed, thus we want
the cmm_smp_rmb/cmm_smp_wmb macros to be simple compiler barriers.
So, let the per-arch files override the default definitions in
arch/generic.h.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>
---
urcu/arch/generic.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/urcu/arch/generic.h b/urcu/arch/generic.h
index 100d3c6..1ea7f59 100644
--- a/urcu/arch/generic.h
+++ b/urcu/arch/generic.h
@@ -100,22 +100,50 @@ extern "C" {
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_SMP
+#ifndef cmm_smp_mb
#define cmm_smp_mb() cmm_mb()
+#endif
+#ifndef cmm_smp_rmb
#define cmm_smp_rmb() cmm_rmb()
+#endif
+#ifndef cmm_smp_wmb
#define cmm_smp_wmb() cmm_wmb()
+#endif
+#ifndef cmm_smp_mc
#define cmm_smp_mc() cmm_mc()
+#endif
+#ifndef cmm_smp_rmc
#define cmm_smp_rmc() cmm_rmc()
+#endif
+#ifndef cmm_smp_wmc
#define cmm_smp_wmc() cmm_wmc()
+#endif
+#ifndef cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends
#define cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends() cmm_read_barrier_depends()
+#endif
#else
+#ifndef cmm_smp_mb
#define cmm_smp_mb() cmm_barrier()
+#endif
+#ifndef cmm_smp_rmb
#define cmm_smp_rmb() cmm_barrier()
+#endif
+#ifndef cmm_smp_wmb
#define cmm_smp_wmb() cmm_barrier()
+#endif
+#ifndef cmm_smp_mc
#define cmm_smp_mc() cmm_barrier()
+#endif
+#ifndef cmm_smp_rmc
#define cmm_smp_rmc() cmm_barrier()
+#endif
+#ifndef cmm_smp_wmc
#define cmm_smp_wmc() cmm_barrier()
+#endif
+#ifndef cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends
#define cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends()
#endif
+#endif
#ifndef caa_cpu_relax
#define caa_cpu_relax() cmm_barrier()
--
1.7.6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 2/2] cmm: do not generate code for smp_rmb/smp_wmb on x86_64, smp_rmb on i686
2011-09-06 11:48 ` [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 2/2] cmm: do not generate code for smp_rmb/smp_wmb on x86_64, smp_rmb on i686 Paolo Bonzini
@ 2011-09-06 22:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2011-09-06 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonzini at redhat.com) wrote:
> Usually we can assume no accesses to write-combining memory occur,
> and also that there are no non-temporal load/stores (people would presumably
> write those with assembly or intrinsics and put appropriate lfence/sfence
> manually). In this case rmb and wmb are no-ops on x86. Define cmm_smp_rmb
> and cmm_smp_wmb to be the "common" operations, while leaving cmm_rmb
> and cmm_wmb in place for more sophisticated uses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>
> ---
> urcu/arch/x86.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/urcu/arch/x86.h b/urcu/arch/x86.h
> index 9e5411f..69f0416 100644
> --- a/urcu/arch/x86.h
> +++ b/urcu/arch/x86.h
> @@ -33,13 +33,30 @@ extern "C" {
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_HAVE_FENCE
> #define cmm_mb() asm volatile("mfence":::"memory")
> +
> +/*
> + * Define cmm_rmb/cmm_wmb to "strict" barriers that may be needed when
> + * using SSE or working with I/O areas. cmm_smp_rmb/cmm_smp_wmb are
> + * only compiler barriers, which is enough for general use.
> + */
> #define cmm_rmb() asm volatile("lfence":::"memory")
> #define cmm_wmb() asm volatile("sfence"::: "memory")
> +
> +/*
> + * An empty cmm_smp_rmb() may not be enough on old PentiumPro multiprocessor
> + * systems, due to an erratum. The Linux kernel says that "Even distro
> + * kernels should think twice before enabling this", but for now let's
> + * be conservative and leave the full barrier on 32-bit processors.
> + */
> +#define cmm_smp_rmb() cmm_barrier()
This comment does not match the #if /#else branch of the code it
discusses. It should be moved to the #else branch.
> +
> +/*
> + * IDT WinChip supports weak store ordering, and the kernel may enable it
> + * under our feet; cmm_smp_wmb() ceases to be a nop for these processors.
> + * However, this never happens on any processor that has *fence instructions.
Same for the comment about IDT WinChip.
Thanks!
Mathieu
> + */
> +#define cmm_smp_wmb() cmm_barrier()
> #else
> -/*
> - * Some non-Intel clones support out of order store. cmm_wmb() ceases to be a
> - * nop for these.
> - */
> #define cmm_mb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)":::"memory")
> #define cmm_rmb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)":::"memory")
> #define cmm_wmb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)"::: "memory")
> --
> 1.7.6
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 1/2] cmm: let per-arch files provide cmm_smp_* barriers
2011-09-06 11:50 ` [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 1/2] cmm: let per-arch files provide cmm_smp_* barriers Paolo Bonzini
@ 2011-09-10 19:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2011-09-10 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonzini at redhat.com) wrote:
> x86 instructions lfence and sfence are rarely needed, thus we want
> the cmm_smp_rmb/cmm_smp_wmb macros to be simple compiler barriers.
> So, let the per-arch files override the default definitions in
> arch/generic.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>
Merged, thanks!
Mathieu
> ---
> urcu/arch/generic.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/urcu/arch/generic.h b/urcu/arch/generic.h
> index 100d3c6..1ea7f59 100644
> --- a/urcu/arch/generic.h
> +++ b/urcu/arch/generic.h
> @@ -100,22 +100,50 @@ extern "C" {
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_SMP
> +#ifndef cmm_smp_mb
> #define cmm_smp_mb() cmm_mb()
> +#endif
> +#ifndef cmm_smp_rmb
> #define cmm_smp_rmb() cmm_rmb()
> +#endif
> +#ifndef cmm_smp_wmb
> #define cmm_smp_wmb() cmm_wmb()
> +#endif
> +#ifndef cmm_smp_mc
> #define cmm_smp_mc() cmm_mc()
> +#endif
> +#ifndef cmm_smp_rmc
> #define cmm_smp_rmc() cmm_rmc()
> +#endif
> +#ifndef cmm_smp_wmc
> #define cmm_smp_wmc() cmm_wmc()
> +#endif
> +#ifndef cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends
> #define cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends() cmm_read_barrier_depends()
> +#endif
> #else
> +#ifndef cmm_smp_mb
> #define cmm_smp_mb() cmm_barrier()
> +#endif
> +#ifndef cmm_smp_rmb
> #define cmm_smp_rmb() cmm_barrier()
> +#endif
> +#ifndef cmm_smp_wmb
> #define cmm_smp_wmb() cmm_barrier()
> +#endif
> +#ifndef cmm_smp_mc
> #define cmm_smp_mc() cmm_barrier()
> +#endif
> +#ifndef cmm_smp_rmc
> #define cmm_smp_rmc() cmm_barrier()
> +#endif
> +#ifndef cmm_smp_wmc
> #define cmm_smp_wmc() cmm_barrier()
> +#endif
> +#ifndef cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends
> #define cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends()
> #endif
> +#endif
>
> #ifndef caa_cpu_relax
> #define caa_cpu_relax() cmm_barrier()
> --
> 1.7.6
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-10 19:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <BLU0-SMTP2873B9D52621A937B86083961C0@phx.gbl>
2011-09-06 11:48 ` [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 2/2] cmm: do not generate code for smp_rmb/smp_wmb on x86_64, smp_rmb on i686 Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-06 22:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-06 11:50 ` [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 1/2] cmm: let per-arch files provide cmm_smp_* barriers Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-10 19:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox