* [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 2/2] cmm: do not generate code for smp_rmb/smp_wmb on x86_64, smp_rmb on i686 [not found] <BLU0-SMTP2873B9D52621A937B86083961C0@phx.gbl> @ 2011-09-06 11:48 ` Paolo Bonzini 2011-09-06 22:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2011-09-06 11:50 ` [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 1/2] cmm: let per-arch files provide cmm_smp_* barriers Paolo Bonzini 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2011-09-06 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw) Usually we can assume no accesses to write-combining memory occur, and also that there are no non-temporal load/stores (people would presumably write those with assembly or intrinsics and put appropriate lfence/sfence manually). In this case rmb and wmb are no-ops on x86. Define cmm_smp_rmb and cmm_smp_wmb to be the "common" operations, while leaving cmm_rmb and cmm_wmb in place for more sophisticated uses. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> --- urcu/arch/x86.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/urcu/arch/x86.h b/urcu/arch/x86.h index 9e5411f..69f0416 100644 --- a/urcu/arch/x86.h +++ b/urcu/arch/x86.h @@ -33,13 +33,30 @@ extern "C" { #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_HAVE_FENCE #define cmm_mb() asm volatile("mfence":::"memory") + +/* + * Define cmm_rmb/cmm_wmb to "strict" barriers that may be needed when + * using SSE or working with I/O areas. cmm_smp_rmb/cmm_smp_wmb are + * only compiler barriers, which is enough for general use. + */ #define cmm_rmb() asm volatile("lfence":::"memory") #define cmm_wmb() asm volatile("sfence"::: "memory") + +/* + * An empty cmm_smp_rmb() may not be enough on old PentiumPro multiprocessor + * systems, due to an erratum. The Linux kernel says that "Even distro + * kernels should think twice before enabling this", but for now let's + * be conservative and leave the full barrier on 32-bit processors. + */ +#define cmm_smp_rmb() cmm_barrier() + +/* + * IDT WinChip supports weak store ordering, and the kernel may enable it + * under our feet; cmm_smp_wmb() ceases to be a nop for these processors. + * However, this never happens on any processor that has *fence instructions. + */ +#define cmm_smp_wmb() cmm_barrier() #else -/* - * Some non-Intel clones support out of order store. cmm_wmb() ceases to be a - * nop for these. - */ #define cmm_mb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)":::"memory") #define cmm_rmb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)":::"memory") #define cmm_wmb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)"::: "memory") -- 1.7.6 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 2/2] cmm: do not generate code for smp_rmb/smp_wmb on x86_64, smp_rmb on i686 2011-09-06 11:48 ` [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 2/2] cmm: do not generate code for smp_rmb/smp_wmb on x86_64, smp_rmb on i686 Paolo Bonzini @ 2011-09-06 22:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2011-09-06 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw) * Paolo Bonzini (pbonzini at redhat.com) wrote: > Usually we can assume no accesses to write-combining memory occur, > and also that there are no non-temporal load/stores (people would presumably > write those with assembly or intrinsics and put appropriate lfence/sfence > manually). In this case rmb and wmb are no-ops on x86. Define cmm_smp_rmb > and cmm_smp_wmb to be the "common" operations, while leaving cmm_rmb > and cmm_wmb in place for more sophisticated uses. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> > --- > urcu/arch/x86.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/urcu/arch/x86.h b/urcu/arch/x86.h > index 9e5411f..69f0416 100644 > --- a/urcu/arch/x86.h > +++ b/urcu/arch/x86.h > @@ -33,13 +33,30 @@ extern "C" { > > #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_HAVE_FENCE > #define cmm_mb() asm volatile("mfence":::"memory") > + > +/* > + * Define cmm_rmb/cmm_wmb to "strict" barriers that may be needed when > + * using SSE or working with I/O areas. cmm_smp_rmb/cmm_smp_wmb are > + * only compiler barriers, which is enough for general use. > + */ > #define cmm_rmb() asm volatile("lfence":::"memory") > #define cmm_wmb() asm volatile("sfence"::: "memory") > + > +/* > + * An empty cmm_smp_rmb() may not be enough on old PentiumPro multiprocessor > + * systems, due to an erratum. The Linux kernel says that "Even distro > + * kernels should think twice before enabling this", but for now let's > + * be conservative and leave the full barrier on 32-bit processors. > + */ > +#define cmm_smp_rmb() cmm_barrier() This comment does not match the #if /#else branch of the code it discusses. It should be moved to the #else branch. > + > +/* > + * IDT WinChip supports weak store ordering, and the kernel may enable it > + * under our feet; cmm_smp_wmb() ceases to be a nop for these processors. > + * However, this never happens on any processor that has *fence instructions. Same for the comment about IDT WinChip. Thanks! Mathieu > + */ > +#define cmm_smp_wmb() cmm_barrier() > #else > -/* > - * Some non-Intel clones support out of order store. cmm_wmb() ceases to be a > - * nop for these. > - */ > #define cmm_mb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)":::"memory") > #define cmm_rmb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)":::"memory") > #define cmm_wmb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)"::: "memory") > -- > 1.7.6 > > > _______________________________________________ > ltt-dev mailing list > ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 1/2] cmm: let per-arch files provide cmm_smp_* barriers [not found] <BLU0-SMTP2873B9D52621A937B86083961C0@phx.gbl> 2011-09-06 11:48 ` [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 2/2] cmm: do not generate code for smp_rmb/smp_wmb on x86_64, smp_rmb on i686 Paolo Bonzini @ 2011-09-06 11:50 ` Paolo Bonzini 2011-09-10 19:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2011-09-06 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw) x86 instructions lfence and sfence are rarely needed, thus we want the cmm_smp_rmb/cmm_smp_wmb macros to be simple compiler barriers. So, let the per-arch files override the default definitions in arch/generic.h. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> --- urcu/arch/generic.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/urcu/arch/generic.h b/urcu/arch/generic.h index 100d3c6..1ea7f59 100644 --- a/urcu/arch/generic.h +++ b/urcu/arch/generic.h @@ -100,22 +100,50 @@ extern "C" { #endif #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_SMP +#ifndef cmm_smp_mb #define cmm_smp_mb() cmm_mb() +#endif +#ifndef cmm_smp_rmb #define cmm_smp_rmb() cmm_rmb() +#endif +#ifndef cmm_smp_wmb #define cmm_smp_wmb() cmm_wmb() +#endif +#ifndef cmm_smp_mc #define cmm_smp_mc() cmm_mc() +#endif +#ifndef cmm_smp_rmc #define cmm_smp_rmc() cmm_rmc() +#endif +#ifndef cmm_smp_wmc #define cmm_smp_wmc() cmm_wmc() +#endif +#ifndef cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends #define cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends() cmm_read_barrier_depends() +#endif #else +#ifndef cmm_smp_mb #define cmm_smp_mb() cmm_barrier() +#endif +#ifndef cmm_smp_rmb #define cmm_smp_rmb() cmm_barrier() +#endif +#ifndef cmm_smp_wmb #define cmm_smp_wmb() cmm_barrier() +#endif +#ifndef cmm_smp_mc #define cmm_smp_mc() cmm_barrier() +#endif +#ifndef cmm_smp_rmc #define cmm_smp_rmc() cmm_barrier() +#endif +#ifndef cmm_smp_wmc #define cmm_smp_wmc() cmm_barrier() +#endif +#ifndef cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends #define cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends() #endif +#endif #ifndef caa_cpu_relax #define caa_cpu_relax() cmm_barrier() -- 1.7.6 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 1/2] cmm: let per-arch files provide cmm_smp_* barriers 2011-09-06 11:50 ` [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 1/2] cmm: let per-arch files provide cmm_smp_* barriers Paolo Bonzini @ 2011-09-10 19:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2011-09-10 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw) * Paolo Bonzini (pbonzini at redhat.com) wrote: > x86 instructions lfence and sfence are rarely needed, thus we want > the cmm_smp_rmb/cmm_smp_wmb macros to be simple compiler barriers. > So, let the per-arch files override the default definitions in > arch/generic.h. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> Merged, thanks! Mathieu > --- > urcu/arch/generic.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/urcu/arch/generic.h b/urcu/arch/generic.h > index 100d3c6..1ea7f59 100644 > --- a/urcu/arch/generic.h > +++ b/urcu/arch/generic.h > @@ -100,22 +100,50 @@ extern "C" { > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_SMP > +#ifndef cmm_smp_mb > #define cmm_smp_mb() cmm_mb() > +#endif > +#ifndef cmm_smp_rmb > #define cmm_smp_rmb() cmm_rmb() > +#endif > +#ifndef cmm_smp_wmb > #define cmm_smp_wmb() cmm_wmb() > +#endif > +#ifndef cmm_smp_mc > #define cmm_smp_mc() cmm_mc() > +#endif > +#ifndef cmm_smp_rmc > #define cmm_smp_rmc() cmm_rmc() > +#endif > +#ifndef cmm_smp_wmc > #define cmm_smp_wmc() cmm_wmc() > +#endif > +#ifndef cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends > #define cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends() cmm_read_barrier_depends() > +#endif > #else > +#ifndef cmm_smp_mb > #define cmm_smp_mb() cmm_barrier() > +#endif > +#ifndef cmm_smp_rmb > #define cmm_smp_rmb() cmm_barrier() > +#endif > +#ifndef cmm_smp_wmb > #define cmm_smp_wmb() cmm_barrier() > +#endif > +#ifndef cmm_smp_mc > #define cmm_smp_mc() cmm_barrier() > +#endif > +#ifndef cmm_smp_rmc > #define cmm_smp_rmc() cmm_barrier() > +#endif > +#ifndef cmm_smp_wmc > #define cmm_smp_wmc() cmm_barrier() > +#endif > +#ifndef cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends > #define cmm_smp_read_barrier_depends() > #endif > +#endif > > #ifndef caa_cpu_relax > #define caa_cpu_relax() cmm_barrier() > -- > 1.7.6 > > > _______________________________________________ > ltt-dev mailing list > ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-10 19:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <BLU0-SMTP2873B9D52621A937B86083961C0@phx.gbl>
2011-09-06 11:48 ` [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 2/2] cmm: do not generate code for smp_rmb/smp_wmb on x86_64, smp_rmb on i686 Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-06 22:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-06 11:50 ` [ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 1/2] cmm: let per-arch files provide cmm_smp_* barriers Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-10 19:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox