[lttng-dev] LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync

[mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers)]

Hi Jon,

Thanks for the updates. Did you manage to get the upgrade path from older lttng versions to work, or do users still need to uninstall the old package manually ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jon Bernard" <jbernard@debian.org>
> To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>, "St?phane Graber" <stgraber at ubuntu.com>, "Alexandre
> Montplaisir" <alexmonthy at voxpopuli.im>, lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:19:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync
> 
> * Jon Bernard <jbernard at debian.org> wrote:
> > * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Jon Bernard" <jbernard@debian.org>
> > > > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>
> > > > Cc: "St?phane Graber" <stgraber at ubuntu.com>, "Alexandre Montplaisir"
> > > > <alexmonthy at voxpopuli.im>,
> > > > lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> > > > Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 9:45:21 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync
> > > > 
> > > [...]
> > > > 
> > > > That is not exactly what I intended to convey, let me be more direct
> > > > about my
> > > > view.  I completely agree that sid should have 2.3.x immediately.  I
> > > > also
> > > > agree
> > > > that 2.3 should be targeted for testing, and therefore the next stable
> > > > release.
> > > 
> > > Allright :) I'm glad we're on the same page, sorry for the
> > > misunderstanding.
> > 
> > No worries.  I'll add that future releases (like the upcoming 2.4) will
> > be prepared and tested all together prior to upload - to hopefully avoid
> > the previous situation/nightmare that I managed to get myself into.
> > 
> > There can still be a sizable amount of work for 2.3 to fully land into
> > testing, so that is my primary focus.  The freeze deadline is fast
> > approaching, so I will be keeping a close eye on things as they
> > progress.  As things settle I'll post status here.
> 
> lttng-tools 2.3.0 was just accepted, so on sid (unstable) we should now be at
> version 2.3.0 across the board.  Things look pretty good to me, but if anyone
> has time to test the packages and let me know if something's missing,
> structured
> incorrectly, or not behaving as expected - that would be awesome.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Jon
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com