Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dgoulet@efficios.com (David Goulet)
Subject: [lttng-dev] LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:39:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131112153903.GC7321@thessa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131103231921.GA6958@shaniqua>

On 03 Nov (18:19:21), Jon Bernard wrote:
> * Jon Bernard <jbernard at debian.org> wrote:
> > * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Jon Bernard" <jbernard@debian.org>
> > > > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>
> > > > Cc: "St?phane Graber" <stgraber at ubuntu.com>, "Alexandre Montplaisir" <alexmonthy at voxpopuli.im>,
> > > > lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> > > > Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 9:45:21 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync
> > > > 
> > > [...]
> > > > 
> > > > That is not exactly what I intended to convey, let me be more direct about my
> > > > view.  I completely agree that sid should have 2.3.x immediately.  I also
> > > > agree
> > > > that 2.3 should be targeted for testing, and therefore the next stable
> > > > release.
> > > 
> > > Allright :) I'm glad we're on the same page, sorry for the misunderstanding.
> > 
> > No worries.  I'll add that future releases (like the upcoming 2.4) will
> > be prepared and tested all together prior to upload - to hopefully avoid
> > the previous situation/nightmare that I managed to get myself into.
> > 
> > There can still be a sizable amount of work for 2.3 to fully land into
> > testing, so that is my primary focus.  The freeze deadline is fast
> > approaching, so I will be keeping a close eye on things as they
> > progress.  As things settle I'll post status here.
> 
> lttng-tools 2.3.0 was just accepted, so on sid (unstable) we should now be at
> version 2.3.0 across the board.  Things look pretty good to me, but if anyone
> has time to test the packages and let me know if something's missing, structured
> incorrectly, or not behaving as expected - that would be awesome.

Why is lttng-tools depending on "lttng-modules-dkms"? It should not, it
should only be a suggested package.

http://packages.debian.org/sid/lttng-tools

Thanks!
David

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -- 
> Jon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 620 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.lttng.org/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20131112/e3cb06a0/attachment.pgp>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-12 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <630558869.45441.1382211345502.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
     [not found] ` <856849325.45462.1382211994767.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
     [not found]   ` <20131019211009.GA83292@helmut.local>
     [not found]     ` <300817690.45707.1382242504740.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
     [not found]       ` <20131020134521.GA97360@helmut.local>
     [not found]         ` <1084047903.45979.1382281219903.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
     [not found]           ` <20131020160434.GA2011@helmut.local>
2013-11-03 23:19             ` Jon Bernard
2013-11-10 14:52               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-10 15:21                 ` Jon Bernard
2013-11-10 15:29                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-11-13  1:42                     ` Yannick Brosseau
2013-11-13 17:01                       ` Jon Bernard
2013-11-14 20:45                         ` Jon Bernard
2013-11-12 15:39               ` David Goulet [this message]
2013-11-13 21:02                 ` Jon Bernard
2013-11-13 21:09                   ` David Goulet
2013-11-22 18:57             ` Jon Bernard
2013-11-22 19:02               ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131112153903.GC7321@thessa \
    --to=dgoulet@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox