[lttng-dev] LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync

[jbernard@debian.org (Jon Bernard)]

* Jon Bernard <jbernard at debian.org> wrote:
> * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jon Bernard" <jbernard@debian.org>
> > > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>
> > > Cc: "St?phane Graber" <stgraber at ubuntu.com>, "Alexandre Montplaisir" <alexmonthy at voxpopuli.im>,
> > > lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> > > Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 9:45:21 AM
> > > Subject: Re: LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync
> > > 
> > [...]
> > > 
> > > That is not exactly what I intended to convey, let me be more direct about my
> > > view.  I completely agree that sid should have 2.3.x immediately.  I also
> > > agree
> > > that 2.3 should be targeted for testing, and therefore the next stable
> > > release.
> > 
> > Allright :) I'm glad we're on the same page, sorry for the misunderstanding.
> 
> No worries.  I'll add that future releases (like the upcoming 2.4) will
> be prepared and tested all together prior to upload - to hopefully avoid
> the previous situation/nightmare that I managed to get myself into.
> 
> There can still be a sizable amount of work for 2.3 to fully land into
> testing, so that is my primary focus.  The freeze deadline is fast
> approaching, so I will be keeping a close eye on things as they
> progress.  As things settle I'll post status here.

lttng-tools 2.3.0 was just accepted, so on sid (unstable) we should now be at
version 2.3.0 across the board.  Things look pretty good to me, but if anyone
has time to test the packages and let me know if something's missing, structured
incorrectly, or not behaving as expected - that would be awesome.

Cheers,

-- 
Jon