* [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] Fix segfault in ust_fork
@ 2011-02-18 19:20 Yannick Brosseau
2011-02-18 20:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yannick Brosseau @ 2011-02-18 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
Move the ltt_trace_destroy after the iteration of open_buffer_list. The destroy
free the pointers used in the open_buffer_list
Signed-off-by: Yannick Brosseau <yannick.brosseau at gmail.com>
---
libust/tracectl.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libust/tracectl.c b/libust/tracectl.c
index d32deba..1bd7229 100644
--- a/libust/tracectl.c
+++ b/libust/tracectl.c
@@ -1581,7 +1581,6 @@ static void ust_fork(void)
ltt_unlock_traces();
ltt_trace_stop("auto");
- ltt_trace_destroy("auto", 1);
/* Delete all active connections, but leave them in the epoll set */
cds_list_for_each_entry_safe(sock, sock_tmp, &ust_socks, list) {
ustcomm_del_sock(sock, 1);
@@ -1601,6 +1600,8 @@ static void ust_fork(void)
cds_list_del(&buf->open_buffers_list);
}
+ ltt_trace_destroy("auto", 1);
+
/* Clean up the listener socket and epoll, keeping the scoket file */
ustcomm_del_named_sock(listen_sock, 1);
close(epoll_fd);
--
1.7.2.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] Fix segfault in ust_fork
2011-02-18 19:20 [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] Fix segfault in ust_fork Yannick Brosseau
@ 2011-02-18 20:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2011-02-18 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
* Yannick Brosseau (yannick.brosseau at gmail.com) wrote:
> Move the ltt_trace_destroy after the iteration of open_buffer_list. The destroy
> free the pointers used in the open_buffer_list
Merged,
Thanks Yannick for hunting this bug down.
Mathieu
>
> Signed-off-by: Yannick Brosseau <yannick.brosseau at gmail.com>
> ---
> libust/tracectl.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libust/tracectl.c b/libust/tracectl.c
> index d32deba..1bd7229 100644
> --- a/libust/tracectl.c
> +++ b/libust/tracectl.c
> @@ -1581,7 +1581,6 @@ static void ust_fork(void)
> ltt_unlock_traces();
>
> ltt_trace_stop("auto");
> - ltt_trace_destroy("auto", 1);
> /* Delete all active connections, but leave them in the epoll set */
> cds_list_for_each_entry_safe(sock, sock_tmp, &ust_socks, list) {
> ustcomm_del_sock(sock, 1);
> @@ -1601,6 +1600,8 @@ static void ust_fork(void)
> cds_list_del(&buf->open_buffers_list);
> }
>
> + ltt_trace_destroy("auto", 1);
> +
> /* Clean up the listener socket and epoll, keeping the scoket file */
> ustcomm_del_named_sock(listen_sock, 1);
> close(epoll_fd);
> --
> 1.7.2.3
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-18 20:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-18 19:20 [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] Fix segfault in ust_fork Yannick Brosseau
2011-02-18 20:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox