From: Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com>
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: Tim Newsome <tim@sifive.com>,
Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com>,
gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: read target register to decide breakpoint size
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wwokeg1aofnb.fsf@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161214091811.GH25542@E107787-LIN>
Yao Qi writes:
> On 16-12-13 13:30:02, Tim Newsome wrote:
>> Actually, this seems to work inside breakpoint_kind_from_pc():
>> ```
>> struct frame_info *frame = get_current_frame ();
>> uint32_t misa = get_frame_register_unsigned (frame, RISCV_CSR_MISA_REGNUM);
>> ```
>>
>> Is that kosher? If so, is there any reason for me to implement
>> breakpoint_kind_from_current_state?
>
> I'd like not to do so. Can't you decode the instruction to see whether
> it is compressed or uncompressed? I also think it is a good idea to
> make a decision based on ELF info, as you mentioned in the first email.
Correct me if I'm wrong but reading the RISC-V arch manual, it seems
like the MISA register information is static.
So unlike arm where the ISA might change, on RISC-V it is static for the
life of the program ?
If that's true, and that you can't decode the instruction, it doesn't
seem that bad to use the register in kind_from_pc ?
Yao, was your concern that this would be non-static, or there is another
reason ?
However thinking about the ELF info, could you elaborate on why it may
not reflect what is actually being executed ? And how this is a problem
?
A note about _from_current_state too this is used while single_stepping
since GDB knows it's about to set a breakpoint from a known state to
the next location, this differs from from_pc which is used to set a pc from
any state to any location.
So in your case it's really from_pc that you want.
Thanks,
Antoine
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-14 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-18 23:44 Tim Newsome
2016-11-19 1:16 ` Ofir Cohen
2016-11-21 16:37 ` Antoine Tremblay
2016-11-21 18:00 ` Tim Newsome
2016-12-13 20:58 ` Tim Newsome
2016-12-13 21:30 ` Tim Newsome
2016-12-14 9:18 ` Yao Qi
2016-12-14 12:32 ` Antoine Tremblay [this message]
2016-12-14 17:02 ` Tim Newsome
2016-12-14 17:22 ` Yao Qi
2016-12-14 18:15 ` Antoine Tremblay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=wwokeg1aofnb.fsf@ericsson.com \
--to=antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=tim@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox