* whodunnit? info sources now returns duplicates
@ 2004-09-15 10:12 David Lecomber
2004-09-15 17:49 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-15 18:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Lecomber @ 2004-09-15 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
This is a regression bug -- the version I have tested this are
from CVS on 2004-08-17, and 2004-06-22.
Any test program:
foo/test.c
int main() {
int x;
}
now compile - but in the directory above foo.
gcc -g foo/test.c
run gdb ./a.out
For 20040622, only foo/test.c is listed in info sources (correct)
For 20040817 (and recent 20040913) foo/test.c and test.c are listed..
(incorrect)
When you add a breakpoint to main, and do info sources, the duplicate
vanishes..
Any takers?
d.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: whodunnit? info sources now returns duplicates 2004-09-15 10:12 whodunnit? info sources now returns duplicates David Lecomber @ 2004-09-15 17:49 ` Andrew Cagney 2004-09-15 18:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-09-15 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Lecomber; +Cc: gdb Lets use this to remind ourselves that what we don't test (as in gdb/testsuite/) doesn't work. Andrew > This is a regression bug -- the version I have tested this are > from CVS on 2004-08-17, and 2004-06-22. > > Any test program: > > foo/test.c > > int main() { > int x; > } > > now compile - but in the directory above foo. > > gcc -g foo/test.c > > run gdb ./a.out > > For 20040622, only foo/test.c is listed in info sources (correct) > For 20040817 (and recent 20040913) foo/test.c and test.c are listed.. > (incorrect) > > When you add a breakpoint to main, and do info sources, the duplicate > vanishes.. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: whodunnit? info sources now returns duplicates 2004-09-15 10:12 whodunnit? info sources now returns duplicates David Lecomber 2004-09-15 17:49 ` Andrew Cagney @ 2004-09-15 18:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2004-09-15 22:11 ` Jim Blandy 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-09-15 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Lecomber; +Cc: gdb On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 11:14:56AM +0100, David Lecomber wrote: > This is a regression bug -- the version I have tested this are > from CVS on 2004-08-17, and 2004-06-22. > > Any test program: > > foo/test.c > > int main() { > int x; > } > > now compile - but in the directory above foo. > > gcc -g foo/test.c > > run gdb ./a.out > > For 20040622, only foo/test.c is listed in info sources (correct) > For 20040817 (and recent 20040913) foo/test.c and test.c are listed.. > (incorrect) > > When you add a breakpoint to main, and do info sources, the duplicate > vanishes.. > > Any takers? Joel's patch to dwarf2read to create symtabs based on the line table also creates symtabs if the name of the compilation unit and the name in the line table don't match. I noticed this last week and don't know what to do about it. One workaround is a patch I whipped together to display the fullname in info sources output (arguably more useful anyway). The two will have the same fullnames and we already have code to suppress printing the duplicates. Attached. What do you think? -- Daniel Jacobowitz Index: gdb/symtab.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/symtab.c,v retrieving revision 1.136 diff -u -p -r1.136 symtab.c --- gdb/symtab.c 11 Sep 2004 10:24:51 -0000 1.136 +++ gdb/symtab.c 14 Sep 2004 23:35:12 -0000 @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static void variables_info (char *, int) static void sources_info (char *, int); -static void output_source_filename (char *, int *); +static void output_source_filename (const char *, int *); static int find_line_common (struct linetable *, int, int *); @@ -2622,7 +2622,7 @@ filename_seen (const char *file, int add NAME is the name to print and *FIRST is nonzero if this is the first name printed. Set *FIRST to zero. */ static void -output_source_filename (char *name, int *first) +output_source_filename (const char *name, int *first) { /* Since a single source file can result in several partial symbol tables, we need to avoid printing it more than once. Note: if @@ -2671,7 +2671,8 @@ sources_info (char *ignore, int from_tty first = 1; ALL_SYMTABS (objfile, s) { - output_source_filename (s->filename, &first); + const char *fullname = symtab_to_fullname (s); + output_source_filename (fullname ? fullname : s->filename, &first); } printf_filtered ("\n\n"); @@ -2682,7 +2683,8 @@ sources_info (char *ignore, int from_tty { if (!ps->readin) { - output_source_filename (ps->filename, &first); + const char *fullname = psymtab_to_fullname (ps); + output_source_filename (fullname ? fullname : ps->filename, &first); } } printf_filtered ("\n"); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: whodunnit? info sources now returns duplicates 2004-09-15 18:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-09-15 22:11 ` Jim Blandy 2004-09-16 16:26 ` Andrew Cagney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jim Blandy @ 2004-09-15 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: David Lecomber, gdb Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 11:14:56AM +0100, David Lecomber wrote: > > This is a regression bug -- the version I have tested this are > > from CVS on 2004-08-17, and 2004-06-22. > > > > Any test program: > > > > foo/test.c > > > > int main() { > > int x; > > } > > > > now compile - but in the directory above foo. > > > > gcc -g foo/test.c > > > > run gdb ./a.out > > > > For 20040622, only foo/test.c is listed in info sources (correct) > > For 20040817 (and recent 20040913) foo/test.c and test.c are listed.. > > (incorrect) > > > > When you add a breakpoint to main, and do info sources, the duplicate > > vanishes.. > > > > Any takers? > > Joel's patch to dwarf2read to create symtabs based on the line table > also creates symtabs if the name of the compilation unit and the name > in the line table don't match. I noticed this last week and don't know > what to do about it. > > One workaround is a patch I whipped together to display the fullname in > info sources output (arguably more useful anyway). The two will have > the same fullnames and we already have code to suppress printing the > duplicates. Attached. > > What do you think? Looks good to me. If you've tested it, go ahead and commit. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: whodunnit? info sources now returns duplicates 2004-09-15 22:11 ` Jim Blandy @ 2004-09-16 16:26 ` Andrew Cagney 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-09-16 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Blandy; +Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz, David Lecomber, gdb > Looks good to me. If you've tested it, go ahead and commit. That's using the testsuite, right ;-) Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-16 16:26 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-09-15 10:12 whodunnit? info sources now returns duplicates David Lecomber 2004-09-15 17:49 ` Andrew Cagney 2004-09-15 18:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2004-09-15 22:11 ` Jim Blandy 2004-09-16 16:26 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox